摘要
目的：对我院开展腹膜透析以来两种首始透析方法的优劣作比较。方法：分别统计１９９０年以前及１９９０年以后我院行腹膜透析的患者各１６０及２００例，对他们行腹膜透析术后到开始持续性不卧床腹膜透析（ＣＡＰＤ）的时间、并发症、不良反应及住院天数作出比较并进行统计学的分析。结果：旧首始透析方法的住院天数、并发症及不良反应明显多于新的首始透析方法。结论：新的腹膜首始透析方法可以更好更快地缓解患者的尿毒症症状，减少住院天数，患者所需的费用相对更少。
Objective:To compare two kind of the starting methods of peritoneal dialysis of our hospital. Methods: 160 and 200 cases of peritoneal dialysis patients were statistical analyzed respectively about their time of CAPD,complications,side-effects and the duration of hospitalization. Results: The time of CAPD,complications, side-effects and the duration of hospitalization of the old method was much more than the new one. Conclusion: The new dialysis method can release the patients' symptoms more quickly significantly and more effectively, and cost more less.
出处
《透析与人工器官》
2001年第2期1-4,共4页
Chinese Journal of Dialysis and Artificial Organs
基金
卫生部临床学科重点项目基金(NO.97040228)
中山医科大学"211"工程(98151)
瑞典Karolinska I
