摘要
目的:比较体外循环冠脉旁路移植术与非体外循环心脏不停跳下冠脉旁路移植术后疗效及护理的差异。方法:同期215例冠脉旁路移植术患者,其中体外循环冠脉旁路移植术109例,非体外循环心脏不停跳冠脉旁路移植术106例,分别观察术后并发症、死亡率以及ICU监护期辅助呼吸时间、ICU监护时间、术后住院天数。结果:经统计学处理,非体外循环冠脉旁路移植术组术后并发症、低心排综合征、肾功能衰竭、应用IABP例数、死亡率、辅助呼吸时间、ICU监护时间、术后住院天数均低于体外循环冠脉旁路移植术组,除胸部并发症P<0.05外余P均<0.01。结论:非体外循环下冠脉旁路移植术优于体外循环冠脉旁路移植术。
Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine, 2003, 12 (3): 277
Abstract; Objective: Comparing the effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between with and without extracorporeal circulation. Methods; A total of 215 CABG patients were divided into with extracorporeal circulation group (109 cases) and without extracorporeal circulation group (106 cases). Operative complication, mortality rate, custodial time in ICU and post-operative days of hospitalization were observed in two groups. Results: Compared with without extracorporeal circulation group, the low cardiac output syndrome, renal failure, chest complication, cases of application intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), mortality rate, custodial time in ICU, time of assisted respiration, post-operative days of hospitalization significantly decreased, P<0. 01 all except chest complication (P< 0. 05). Conclusion: CABG without extracorporeal circulation is better than CABG with extracorporeal circulation.
出处
《心血管康复医学杂志》
CAS
2003年第3期277-278,共2页
Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
