摘要
目的 :比较两种方案治疗小儿急性重度以上特发性血小板减少性紫癜 (ITP)的疗效。方法 :于 1998年 10月～ 2 0 0 2年 10月分别采用甲基强的松龙冲击或甲基强的松龙冲击 +HDIVIG两种方案抢救 98例急性重度以上ITP患儿 ,比较两种方案治疗反应。结果 :甲基强的松龙冲击或甲基强的松龙冲击 +HDIVIG治疗急性重度以上ITP疗效肯定 ,甲基强的松龙冲击 +HDIVIG治疗提升血小板计数达安全范围 ( >3 0× 10 9/L)的平均时间、血小板计数达正常的平均时间、血小板计数达峰值的平均时间优于单用甲基强的松龙冲击治疗者 ,两组血小板峰值无显著性差异。结论 :甲基强的松龙冲击或甲基强的松龙冲击 +HDIVIG治疗急性重度以上ITP疗效肯定 ,甲基强的松龙冲击
Objective To compare the effects of two therapies concerning infantile acute serious idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Method From the October of 1998 to the October of 2002, the two therapies are applied to ninety-eight acute ITP child patients. The therapies are as follows: the large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment,or the large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment plus HDIVIG. Result The large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment plus HDIVIG or the large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment had good effect.The effect of the large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment plus HDIVIG were better than large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment. Conclusion The two therapies had good effect on acute serious idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. The effect of the large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment plus HDIVIG were better than large dose of Methylprednisolone impact treatment.
出处
《中原医刊》
2003年第10期1-2,共2页
Central Plains Medical Journal
