期刊文献+

论农业精英在后发展国家政治发展中的影响 被引量:2

On Effects of the Elites in the Agricultural Sector in the Political Development of the Developing Countries
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 后发展国家政治发展的起点是不同的 ,在大多数国家 ,由于社会变革不彻底或没有变革 ,致使地主这个传统农业精英被保留下来 ,在发展过程中农业资本家的产生并未导致农村社会结构根本变化 ,结果降低了政府的自主能力。农业精英与农民间的庇护关系和经济权利得不到保障 ,阻碍着农民向现代公民转变。 There are large differences in the starts of the political development among the developing countries. In the vast majority of the developing countries, the landlords still remain because there is no social reform or inconsistent social reform in the rural society. The emerging of the agri-capitalists in the developing process doesn't change fundamentally the structure of the rural society. All of this leads to reducing the autonomy of the government. The patron-client relations between the elites in the agricultural sector and the peasants and the economical rights of the peasants being unprotected hinder to turn the peasants into the citizens. The tier structure of the society doesn't provide the social bases for the political development of the developing countries.
作者 卢正涛
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2003年第2期38-42,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 农业精英 后发展国家 政治发展 社会结构 农村 the elites in the agricultural sector developing countries political development
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1](美)亨廷顿.第三波--20世纪后期民主化浪潮[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998.22-23.
  • 2[2]Binode Mohast. Economic Development Perspectives:Agriculture and Rural Development [M]. New Delhi:Commonwealth Publishers, 1991.28.
  • 3[4]Migual D. Ramirez: Mexico's Economic Crisis: Its Origins and Consequences [M]. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1989. 71-72.
  • 4[6]Robert W. Stern, Changing India: Bourgeois Revolution on the Subcontinent [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 97.
  • 5[7]世界银行.1988年世界发展报告[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1998.284-285.

共引文献2

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部