摘要
目的探讨民事司法精神医学鉴定的特点。方法对58例民事司法精神医学鉴定案进行不同案由的前后两个时期的分析比较。结果后3a民事司法精神医学鉴定案的绝对数和相对比例均明显高于前9a;案由以离婚案为主,但后3a反应性精神损伤案增多;不同案由的鉴定始动方有差别;鉴定诊断以精神分裂症居多,但后3a反应性精神障碍及颅脑创伤所致精神障碍增多;根据不同案由主要进行行为能力和精神损伤的法学评定。结论民事司法精神医学鉴定案逐渐增多,案由趋向多样化;随着伤病关系鉴定的增多,鉴定趋向复杂化;做好民事案件的鉴定,有利于社会安定和维护当事人的合法权益。
Objective To investigate the characteristics of civil forensic psychiatry expertise. Methods Causes of forensic psychiatry expertise were analyzed between 2 stages( 1990 - 1998 and 1999 ~ 2001) in 58 civil cases. Results Both the absolute number and relative proportion in the latter 3 years were significantly higher than those in the former 9 years; the main cause was divorce, but the cases of mental hurt increased during the latter 3 years; the initiative sides of expertise were different along with the varied causes; the most expertise diagnoses were schizophrenia, but that of reactive disorder and mental disorder by brain trauma were increasing during the latter 3 years; the forensic expertise mainly assessed relationship between non - effectiveness behavior capacity or mental hurt with the varied causes. Conclusion The cases of civil forensic psychiatry expertise are gradually increasing, and the causes varied. With the increase of expertise for non - effective relationship, the expertise is more complex. Doing the expertise of civil cases well is beneficial to social stability and the safeguard of legal rights and interests of party concerned.
出处
《临床心身疾病杂志》
CAS
2003年第1期33-35,共3页
Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
