期刊文献+

SF-36量表在血透患者中的性能测试 被引量:92

Psychological tests of the SF-36 scales in hemodialysis patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨SF 36量表应用于血透患者生活质量研究的可行性。方法 采用整群抽样法 ,用SF 36量表对杭州市 4家血透中心的 1 81例血透患者进行自评量表式调查。参照国际生命质量评价项目的标准 ,进行信度、效度与反应度的测试。结果 SF 36量表的分半信度是 0 .91 ,8个维度的Cronbachα系数范围为 0 .56~ 0 .90。除了PF维度 ,各维度的集合效度和区分效度成功率均为 1 0 0 %。因子分析产生两个主成分 ,分别代表生理健康和心理健康 ,解释了 69.4%的总方差。SF 36量表总分与世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表总分以及患者自我总体健康评价得分的相关性分别为 0 .85和 0 .76。患者接受血透治疗后 ,PF、RP、BP、VT和SF维度得分显著提高。结论 SF Objective To study the feasibility of measuring health status for hemodialysis patients with end stage renal disease by the SF 36 scales. Methods By a cluster sampling procedure, 181 hemodialysis patients, from 4 hemodialysis centers in Hangzhou, completed the SF 36 scales by self administration. The reliability, validity and responsiveness were tested according to the standard procedure of the International Quality of Life Assessment Project. Results The split half reliability coefficient of the SF 36 was 0.91 and the Cronbach α coefficients of the eight scales ranged from 0.56 to 0.90. The scaling success rates on both convergent validity and discriminative validity were 100% for all scales except PF. Factor analysis identified two principal components which were a physical factor and a mental factor. They could be used to explain 69.4% of the total variance. The correlation coefficient of the total score between the SF 36 and the WHOQOL BREF was 0.85, and that between the SF 36 and the patients' self reported quality of life was 0.76. After the therapy, the scores of PF, RP, BP, VT and SF increased significantly. Conclusion The SF 36 scales satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in Chinese hemodialysis patients.
作者 姜敏敏 李鲁
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2003年第1期31-33,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金 浙江省科技计划项目 ( 99110 4 2 0 9)
关键词 SF-36量表 性能测试 血液透析 生活质量 SF 36 scales Psychological tests Hemodialysis Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1于守洋 陈炳卿.社会营养.营养与食品卫生学,第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.100-101.
  • 2Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 3Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 4Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 5Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 6顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 7Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 8Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 9Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.
  • 10Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412.

共引文献3537

同被引文献1050

引证文献92

二级引证文献1202

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部