期刊文献+

社会资本:公共物品还是私人物品 被引量:15

Social Capital: Public Good or Private Good
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 按照大部分社会资本理论研究者的看法,社会资本应包含信任、规范和网络,且具有公共物品的性质。但是,消极的、不具有公共物品性质的"社会资本"也往往存在于各种社群中。这就构成了社会资本理论中的一个内在矛盾。作为一种能降低社会运行成本的公共物品,社会资本的不同定义应有共同的指称,这是社会资本理论发展中必须解决的问题。明确社会资本的公共物品性质,是社会资本概念成为对各种问题进行跨学科探讨的可靠起点。 According to the views of most theory researchers, social capital should consist of trust, regulation and network together with its characteristics of 'jointness of supply' and 'the impossibility of exclusion' as a public good. Social capital has the functions of ensuring collaboration among communities to improve the efficiency of social operation. But we also find 'social capitals' without the above said functions in all kinds of communities. In fact, this kind of 'social capitals' cannot lead to trust and regulation, and therefore, has no possibility of improving efficiency. Such 'social capitals' can always be found in places that lack mutual trust. It can be public bad or private good. In the present theory, however, the concept of social capital, by all appearances, does not clarify what the social capital is, which becomes the inner flaw of the theory. At present, the concept of social capital is quite suggestive, but is at the same time not rigid and precise enough. It may lead to the misuse of this concept. We cannot use it effectively until we give specific limitation to this concept. As a public good that can lower the cost of social operation, it must be clearly stated that different definitions of social capitals should have something in common. It is because of its direction to the efficiency and trust needed by all societies that it wins recognition from many studying fields. Therefore, we must clarify its characteristic as a public good, and use this as a criterion to exclude the public bad that breaks community trust, and also the private good that only benefits its owner from the category of social capitals. Thus, this concept can be a reliable base for interdisciplinary discussions.
作者 王诗宗
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第2期14-21,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 浙江省哲学社会科学规划年度课题"社会资本 科层制公共组织与政策过程的改进" 编号M 0 2ZF4
关键词 社会资本 公共物品 社群 制度 social capital public good community institutions
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1姚先国,郁建兴.社会资本:市民社会理论的再出发[A].新经济条件下的生存环境与中华文化[C].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002.
  • 2肯尼思@纽顿.社会资本与欧洲现代民主[A].社会资本与社会发展[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
  • 3福山.信任:社会道德与繁荣的创造[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,1998.35,35,35,177,37,41.
  • 4爱德华,弗雷.超越普特南的公民社会与社会资本[A].社会资本与社会发展[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
  • 5彼得@埃文斯.跨越公私界线的发展战略[A].社会资本与社会发展[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
  • 6简@弗泰恩,罗伯特@阿特金森.创新、社会资本与新经济[A].社会资本与社会发展[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
  • 7布尔迪厄.布尔迪厄访谈录:文化资本与社会炼金术[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
  • 8普特南 李惠斌 杨雪冬.繁荣的社群[A].李惠斌,杨雪冬.社会资本与社会发展[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000..
  • 9柯武刚 史曼飞.制度经济学--社会秩序与公共政策[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000..
  • 10保罗@怀特利.社会资本的起源[A].社会资本与社会发展[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.

共引文献210

同被引文献157

引证文献15

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部