期刊文献+

复方丹参/丹参注射液辅助治疗慢性肺心病急性加重期随机试验的系统评价 被引量:6

Salviae miltiorrhizae for chronic cor pulmonale: a systematic review
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 评价丹参/复方丹参注射液辅助治疗慢性肺心病急性加重期的疗效和安全性。设计 随机对照临床试验的Cochrane系统评价。方法 搜集比较加用丹参或复方丹参注射液与单纯采用常规治疗对慢性肺心病急性加重期患者的随机对照临床试验。无语种限制。纳入试验的质量用Jadad记分表评价。结果 符合纳入标准的论文共有30篇,均为中文发表。治疗组疗效症状评分的合并效应量RR(相对危险度)为1.20,95%CI(95%可信区间)为1.15-1.26。血液流变学指标多数因异质性明显不能进行合并计算。由于报道病死率、血小板聚集、氧化物/抗氧化物指标的纳入试验太少,不能得出有推广意义的结论。结论 根据本系统评价,加用丹参/复方丹参注射液辅助治疗慢性肺心病急性加重期患者,对提高疗效尚无肯定结论,在改善血液流变性及体内氧化物/抗氧化物失衡方面,也不能得出可靠的结论。由于试验的方法学质量普遍较低,所选用的实验室指标变异较大,且缺乏与患者生活质量密切相关的指标及一些重要的长期结局指标,目前无足够的证据支持其应用于临床治疗,尚需要设计更加合理、严格执行的大样本随机试验。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection (include Danshen Injection and Fufang Danshen Injection) for chronic Cor Pulmonale.Design A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Methods Randomzied trials comparing Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection plus routine treatment versus routing treatment alone were identified by electronic and manual searches. No blinding and language limitations were applied. The Jadad scale assessed the methodological quality of trials. Results Thirty randomized trials (n = 2 161) were identified. The methodological quality of all trials included was low. The combined results (RR and 95% CI) of symptom scores was 1.20(1.15, 1.26). Because of the significant heterogeneity, many other markers of the blood rheology can not be combined. The reason for heterogeneity should include the differences among cases and studies. Because of lacking enough studies, the conclusions about mortality and oxidants/antioxidants markers were not strong. Only a few studies had reported adverse events. Conclusions Based in the review, Salviae miltiorrhizae Injection may have positive effect on symptom scores in patients with chronic Cor pulmonale. But for mortality, the markers of blood rheology and oxidants/antioxidants, there is no reliable conclusion. However, the evidence is not strong due to the general low methodological quality, the variations among studies and experimental markers themselves, and lacking of more relevant and important markers. Further large trials are needed.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2002年第3期152-161,共10页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 丹参注射液 复方丹参注射液 慢性肺心病 急性加重期 随机临床试验 COCHRANE系统评价 META-分析 Red Rage Rcot Injection chronic Cor pulmonale systematic review randomized clinical trials Meta - analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1American Thoracic Society. Medical section of the American Lung Association, Standard for diagnosis and care of patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1995, 152: 577.
  • 2李景周,徐希胜,谢宝元等.北京农村慢性阻塞性肺疾病调查分析.第七届全国肺心病专业会议论文汇编,1995:116
  • 3王柏生.临床血液流变学[M].郑州:河南医科大学出版社,2001.146,151.
  • 4李廷谦 陈淑清 黄素珍等.益气活血注射液对改善肺心病血循环作用的研究[J].1992,1.
  • 5王浴生,邓文龙,薛春生.主编.中药药理与运用[M]人民卫生出版社 ,1998:191-218.
  • 6-.第二届全国活血化瘀研究学术会议.血瘀证诊断标准[J].中西医结合杂志,1987,7(3):129-129.
  • 7刘建平,林辉,Heather McIntosh.草药叶下珠治疗慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的系统评价[J].中国循证医学,2001,1(2):78-86. 被引量:29
  • 8Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.0; Section 6. In: The Cochrane Library [database on CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford: Update Software; 2000, Issue 1.
  • 9Jadad AR, Moore A, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trails: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials1996;17(1): 1-12.
  • 10Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, et al. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials [J].Control Clin Trials 1998; 19: 159-166

二级参考文献80

共引文献121

同被引文献195

引证文献6

二级引证文献299

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部