期刊文献+

外国直接投资作用的发展经济学观点 被引量:4

The Theory of Development Economics on the Role of Foreign Direct Investment
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 新古典主义、激进主义和结构主义是发展经济学的三大基本思路,在外国直接投资与发展中国家经济发展的关系问题方面,它们各自建立观点不同的理论体系。但是,国内学者只是在新古典主义的基本框架下研究中国的外国直接投资问题。基于引发理论界关于我国外资的现实作用及未来发展战略的重新审视与思考,论述了发展经济学的三大基本思路关于外资与经济发展关系的理论,并作了简要评议。 New classicism,radicalism and structuralism are three essential thought of development economics,each established different theory system on the relationship between foreign direct investment(FDI)and economic development in developing countries.But only under the frame of new classicism theory,domestic scholars research the problem of FDI in china.In order to stimulate the pondering deeply over the role and strategy of FDI in china,on this thesis,we discuss the theories of three essential thought about FDI,and then review simply these theories.
作者 陈志刚
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第4期67-70,共4页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
关键词 外国直接投资 发展经济学 新古典主义 激进主义 结构主义 Foreign Direct Investment(FDI),New Classicism,Radicalism,Structuralism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1P.F. Drucker. Multinationals and Developing Countries:Myths and Realities. Foreign Affairs, No.53 (October, 1974) , pp.126-28.
  • 2H.Johnson. Economic Benefits. in H.R. Hahlo, J.Graham Smith, and Richard W.Wright,eds., Nationalism and Multinational Enterprise: Legal, Economic,and Managerial Aspects (Leiden, The Netherlands: A.W.Sijhoff, 1977) ,pp.168-69.
  • 3T.D.Santos. The Structure of Dependence. in C.K.Wilber,ed., The Political Economic of Development and Undevelopment (New York: Random House 1973) , p. 116.
  • 4R.Muller. The Multinational Corporation and Underdevelopment of the Third World. in Wilber, Political Economy,op. cit.,p. 173.
  • 5F.H.Cardoso. Associated Dependent Development: Theoretical and Practical Consideration. in Alfred Stepan , ed.,Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies , and Future (New Haven,Conn: Yale University Press, 1973) , p. 149.
  • 6G.Gereffi and R.S.Newfarmer. International Oligopoly and Uneven Development: Some Lessons from Industrial Case Studies.in Richard S.Newfarmer, ed., Profits,Progress and Poverty:Case Studies of International Industries in Latin America (Notre Dame,Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1985) , p.432.
  • 7D.C.Bennett and K.E.Sharpe. Agenda Setting and Bargaining Power: The Mexican State versus the International Automobile Industry. World Politics,Vol.32 (October 1979) , p.86.
  • 8G.Gereffi. The Pharmaceutical Industry and Dependency in the Third World (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983) ,pp. 16-61.

同被引文献8

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部