期刊文献+

76种细菌DNA双链碱基使用频率的比较及其意义 被引量:1

Comparing the Base Usage Frequency Between Bacteria DNA Double Strand
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用生物信息学方法 ,对已完成测序的 76种细菌基因组进行比较 ,分析细菌基因组中编码区及密码子上碱基使用频率情况。结果显示 :1 先导链与滞后链上在编码区的碱基使用频率无明显差异且显著正相关。 2 先导链与滞后链在第一、第二、第三密码子碱基使用频率基本一致且显著正相关。结果表明 ,选择压力及自然突变对DNA双链总体碱基分布的影响相等。 During the Evolution,effected by select pressure or nature mutation,the compositons of bacteria genomes is various.And many experiences prove that the genes between leading strand and lagging strand is disticntly in copy,transcription and repair.Some scholars presume that the bases distribution is difference between the two strand,to verify the guess,we using the technology of bioinformatics,compare the base usage between the DNA double strand in 17 species bacteria.The result show:1 there is same bases usage frequency in coding sequence between leading strand and lagging strand 2 There also same bases usage frequency in first codon,second codon and third codon.It suggest that there is a equilibrium between the two strand by the effect of select pressure and nature mutation.
出处 《Acta Genetica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第2期189-192,共4页
基金 国家自然科学重点基金 中山大学青年教师科研启动基金 (3 3 110 113 10 91)资助(No.6993 5 0 2 0 )~~
关键词 细菌 DNA双链 碱基使用频率 比较基因组学 生物信息学 bacteria bases usage frequency compare genome bioinformatics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lobry J R.Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria.Mol Biol Evol, 1996,13(5) :660 ~ 665.
  • 2Rocha E P, Danchin A, Viari A.Universal replication biases in bacteria.Mol Microbiol, 1999,32( 1 ): 11 ~ 16.
  • 3Mrazek J, Karlin S.Strand compositional asymmetry in bacterial and large viral genomes.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998,95 ( 7 ): 3720 ~ 3725.
  • 4Francino M P, Chao L, Riley M A, Ochman H.Asymmetries generatedby transcription-coupled repair in enterobacterial genes.Science, 1996,272(5258): 107 ~ 109.
  • 5Kreutzer D A, Essigmann J M.Oxidized, deaminated cytosines are a source of C→T transitions in vivo.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998,95 (7) :3578 ~ 3582.
  • 6Beletskii A, Bhagwat A S.Correlation between transcription and C to T mutations in the non-transcribed DNA strand.Biol Chem, 1998,379 (4~ 5) :549 ~ 551.
  • 7Frank A C, Lobry J R.Asymmetric substitution patterns:a review of possible underlying mutational or selective mechanisms.Gene, 1999, 238(1) :65~ 77.
  • 8Sueoka N.Two aspects of DNA base composition: G + C content and translation-coupled deviation from intra-strand rule of A = T and G = C.J Mol Evol, 1999,49( 1 ) :49 ~ 62.
  • 9侯卓成,杨宁.影响链球菌属肺炎球菌基因组密码子使用的因素分析[J].Acta Genetica Sinica,2002,29(8):747-752. 被引量:9
  • 10Aravind L, Dixit V M, Koonin E V.Apoptotic molecular machinery: vastly increased complexity in vertebrates revealed by genome comparisons.Science, 2001,291 (5507): 1279 ~ 1284.

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]McInerney J O. Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,1998,95:10698~10703.
  • 2[2]Ghosh T C,Gupta,S K,Majumdar S. Studies on codon usage in Entamoeba histolytica. Int. J. Parasitology,2000,30(6):715~722.
  • 3[3]Romero H,Zavala A,Musto H. Compositional pressure and translational selection determine codon usage in the extremely GC-poor unicellular eukaryote Entamoeba histolytica. Gene,2000,242:307~311.
  • 4[4]Romero H,Zavala A,Musto H. Codon usage in Chlamydia trachomatis is the result of strand-specific mutational biases and a complex pattern of selective forces. Nucleic Acids Research,2000,28:2084~2090.
  • 5[5]Gupta S K,Ghosh T C. Gene expressivity is the main factor in dictating the codon usage variation among the genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene,2001,273:63~70.
  • 6[6]Naya H,Romero H,Carels N et al. Translational selection shapes codon usage in the GC-rich genomes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. FEBS letters,2001,501:127~130.
  • 7[7]Fernandez V,Zavala A,Musto H. Evidence for translational selection in codon usage in Echinococcus spp. Parasitology,2001,123(Pt2):203~209.
  • 8[8]Sueoka K,Kawanishi Y. DNA G+C content of the third codon position and codon usage biases of human genes. Gene,2000,261:53~62.
  • 9[9]Tettlin H,Karen E N,Lan T P et al. Complete genome sequence of a virulent isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Science,2001,293:498~506.
  • 10[10]Sharp P M,Tuohy T M F,Mosurski K R. Codon usage in yeast:cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Research,1986,14:5125~5143.

共引文献8

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部