期刊文献+

棒束临界热流密度流体模化研究 被引量:3

Researches in the Flow Modeling of Critical Heat Flux in Bundle
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在空泡物理和自然循环重点实验室氟里昂热工实验装置上进行了CHF实验 ,实验段为9 5×1 0mm元件管组成的 4× 4棒束 ,并对其开展了 4× 4棒束CHF流体模化研究。在压力 1 5 9~ 2 73MPa、质量流速 4 88~ 2 0 80kg (m2 ·s)、临界含汽率 -0 2 0~ 0 3 0的工况范围内 ,采集了 1 70个 4× 4棒束CHF实验数据 ,并与压力 9 9~ 1 6 2MPa、质量流速 2 74~ 1 4 73kg (m2 ·s)、临界含汽率 -0 2 0~0 3 4工况范围内 ,以水为工质相同棒束实验段内的 2 0 6个棒束CHF实验数据进行比较 ,发现Ahmad补偿失真模型、张振杰模型和Stevens Kirby模型在上述工况范围内不再适用于棒束CHF的模化 ,这些模型的预测偏差均大于 2 0 %以上 ,而且棒束CHF模化的流量模化因子k明显地受压力、质量流量和入口含汽率的影响。据此提出适用于上述工况范围内 4× 4棒束CHF模化的流量模化因子k的关系式 ,其CHF预测偏差在± 1 5 %以内 ,均方根误差为 7 0 5 %。 The CHF experiments were carried out with 4×4 bundle of 9.5×1 rods and 1 000 mm heating length on Freon-12 thermal hydraulic test facility of BPNC. Under conditions of 1.59~2.73 MPa, 488~2 080 kg/(m 2·s) and -0.20~0.30 of the critical quality, 170 test data were collected, which are in accord with 206 CHF experimental data with 4×4 bundle in water under conditions of 9.9~16.2 MPa, 274~1 473 kg/(m 2·s) and -0.20~0.34 of the critical quality. Compared with CHF data between water and Freon-12, it was discovered that all of S.Y.Ahmad's compensation distortion model, Zhangzhenjie's model and Stevens-Kirby's model didn't fitted for bundle, with their error deviations beyond 20%. It was obvious that flow scale factor k was influenced by mass flow rate, pressure and the inlet quality. The correlation of flow scale factor k was then proposed, which improved the prediction precision of CHF modeling with the deviations within ±15% and the r.m.s error of 7.05%.
出处 《核科学与工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2002年第4期309-313,共5页 Nuclear Science and Engineering
关键词 流体模化 流量模化因子 临界热流密度 氟里昂 棒束 反应堆 fluid-to-fluid modeling flow scale factor k CHF Freon-12 bundle
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Macbeth R V. Odds and Events, A Formula for Enhancing the Dryout power in Boiling water Reactor Fuel Channels. European Two-Phase Flow Group Meeting, paper c10. Harwell,1974
  • 2Kobori T, Matsuo M, Kikuchi A. The Effect of Fuel Cluster Eccentricity on Critical Heat Flux in a Full Scale Fuel Assembly. Proc. Juice Meeting, Rept. 11. Janpen, 1974
  • 3马介亮.棒弯曲对DNB影响实验.中国核动力研究设计院(报告号:R-85-04),1997
  • 4宋贤慧.径向不均匀加热对临界热流密度影响实验.中国核动力研究设计院(报告号:R-9-02),1981
  • 5Groeneveld D C, Cheng S C, Doan T. 1986 AECL-UO Critical Heat Flux Lookup Table. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1986, 7, nos. 1~2
  • 6Barnett P G. The scaling of forced convection boiling heat transfer. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Report No. AEEW-R134, 1963
  • 7Ahmad S Y. Fluid to fluid modeling of critical heat flux: A Compensated Distortion Model. International Journal of Heat and Transfer. Chalk River, Ontario, Canada:Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories,1973,16:641~662
  • 8张振杰,陈炳德等.圆管内上升流动的临界热流密度的模化实验研究.中国核动力研究设计院(报告号:R-0-26),1987
  • 9Stevens G F, Kirby G J. A Quantitative comparison between burnout data for water at 1 000 psia and Froen-12 at 155 psia, Uniformly heated round tubes, vertical upflow. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Report No. AEEW-R327,1964
  • 10杨世铭.传热学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1994.104-113.

共引文献6

同被引文献52

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部