摘要
为了达到民事案件审理集中化的目标,美国和德国作为两大法系中具有代表性的国家,依据新的司法理念对审前程序进行了审理结构上的调整或改革。我国民事诉讼法规定了"审理前的准备",但尚未形成独立的审前程序。当前我们构建中国审前程序,应在比较中、美、德民事审前程序的基础上,借鉴美、德立法经验,对民事诉讼失权制度、诉答程序、初步审理、多元化的纠纷解决机制、法官释明权等,进行相应的改革。
To achieve the goal of concentration in dealing with civil cases, USA and Germany, most influential as representative countries of the two great law traditions respectively, have revised or reformed their pretrial procedure in accordance with new legal ideas. China's Civil Procedure Act has stipulated 'pretrial preparations' but has not yet provided for an independent pretrial procedure. To construct a pretrial procedure for China, it is advisable to compare China with USA and Germany in terms of pretrial procedure, draw on the experience of USA and Germany, and make appropriate reforms in such aspects as loss of right in civil procedure, response procedure, pretrial conference, diversified mechanisms for resolving disputes, and the interpreting power of judges..
出处
《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第1期59-66,共8页
Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
关键词
民事诉讼
审前程序
司法改革
civil procedure,pretrial procedure,judicial reform
