期刊文献+

椎体成形术对胸腰椎爆裂型骨折的治疗意义 被引量:89

Vertebroplasty for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸腰椎爆裂型骨折撑开复位与椎体成形术后椎体结构和生物力学性能的变化.方法收集6具新鲜成人尸体的胸腰椎标本,制成T11~L1、L2~L4、T1~L2节段标本共10具,用自由落体撞击试验造成中间椎体爆裂型骨折,撑开复位、用注射型自固化磷酸钙人工骨行椎体成形术.分别于骨折前、骨折撑开复位后、椎体成形术后用薄层CT扫描测量中间椎体内空隙,用双能X线骨密度仪测定骨密度,用万能材料试验机测定骨折前、椎体成形术后中间椎体与其上方椎间盘在前屈、后伸、侧屈和扭转应力下刚度的变化,并比较成形术后的伤椎及其下方的完整椎体的抗极限压缩测试结果.结果8具标本造中间椎体爆裂型骨折模型成功.(1)骨折前椎体内无明显空隙;骨折并撑开复位后椎体内空隙体积平均为5.25 cm3,占椎体总体积的13.9%;椎体成形术后空隙减少,与骨折前相比差异无显著性意义.(2)骨折前椎体骨密度在正常范围,骨折并撑开复位后骨密度较骨折前降低;椎体成形术后,骨密度较骨折复位后及骨折前均明显升高.(3)椎体成形术后,伤椎的刚度与骨折前相比差异无显著性意义,抗极限压缩强度的均值低于其下方完整椎体,但差异无显著性意义;伤椎上方椎间盘在前屈和后伸应力下的刚度小于骨折前,但在侧屈应力下差异无显著性意义;标本在扭转应力下的刚度小于骨折前.结论(1)撑开复位未能恢复胸腰椎爆裂型骨折椎体结构上的完整性,这可能是后路切开复位内固定术后发生内固定失败与矫正度丢失的重要原因.(2)应用注射型自固化磷酸钙人工骨行椎体成形术有助于伤椎的重建,术后脊柱的生物力学特性接近骨折前水平. Objective Short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fracture was known to have a relatively high incidence of failure and correction loss, intracorporeal gap secondary to reduction being probable causes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intracorporeal gap after reduction and the biomechanical effect of vertebroplasty on thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods Six fresh adult thoracolumbar specimens were collected, and 10 segmental specimens (T11-L1, L2-L4, T12-L2) were processed. Burst fracture was created using free-drop test. Then the fractures were reduced and augmented with injectable self-setting calcium phosphate cement. The intracorporeal gap and bone mineral density(BMD) were measured using spiral CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry(DEXA) before fracture, after reduction and after vertebroplasty respectively. The stiffness in middle vertebrae and above discs were measured under flexion, extension, lateral flexion and torsion stress before fracture and after augmentation. The ultimate strength against compression was tested in the augmented vertebrae and the integral vertebrae below it. Results Burst fractures were created in eight of ten specimens. 1) There was no evident intracorporeal gap before fracture, which appeared after reduction with average volume of 5.25 cm3 (13.9% of total corporal volume), and it decreased to normal level after vertebroplasty. 2) The BMD was normal in all specimens before fracture, which decreased significantly after fracture reduction, and it was significantly higher after vertebroplasty than that before fracture or after reduction. 3) There was no significant difference of stiffness in vertebrae before fractures and after augmentation. The mean value of ultimate strength against compression in the augmented vertebrae decreased slightly but not significantly in contrast to the vertebrae below it. In contrast to the value before fracture, the stiffness of above discs decreased significantly under flexion and extension stress but not significantly under lateral flexion stress after augmentation, while the stiffness of the specimen decreased significantly under torsion stress. Conclusion 1) Posterior reduction in thoracolumbar burst fracture can not reestablish intact corporeal structure, which may be an important cause of postoperative implant failure and correction loss. 2) Vertebroplasty with injectable self-setting calcium phosphate cement is helpful to reestablish intact corporeal structure, and restore stiffness and strength of the injured corpora nearly to its initial value.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第12期738-742,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 椎体成形术 胸腰椎爆裂型骨折 治疗 生物力学 Spinal fractures Spinal puncture Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Weidenbaum M, Farcy JPC. Surgical management of thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL, eds. The textbook of spinal surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (NY): Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997. 1839-1880.
  • 2Mathis JM. Percutaneous bone augmentation to treat pain associated with vertebral fracture. In: 24th Annual Scientific Meeting of Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology. Orlando, Florida:SCVIR, 1999. 350-361.
  • 3Bai B, Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, et al. The use of an injectable,biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures. Spine, 1999, 24: 1521-1526.
  • 4Mermelstein LE, McLain RF, Yerby SA. Reinforcement of thoracolumbar burst fractures with calcium phosphate cement: a biomechanical study. Spine, 1998, 23: 664-670.
  • 5Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Lin RM, et al. Thoracolumbar burst fracture: a biomechanical investigation of its multidirectional flexibility.Spine, 1994, 19: 578-585.
  • 6徐宝山,唐天驷.椎管推挡器的设计与应用[J].中华创伤杂志,2002,18(4):204-204. 被引量:2
  • 7Benson DR, Burkus JK, Montesano PX, et al. Unstable thoracolunbar and lumbar burst fractures treated with the AO fixateur interne.J Spinal Disord, 1992, 5: 335-343.
  • 8张贵林,荣国威,丁占云,姜春岩,吴宏华.脊柱胸腰段骨折术后椎弓根螺钉断裂及弯曲松动的原因分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2000,20(8):470-472. 被引量:283
  • 9Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici M, et al. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: dose transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure? Spine, 2001, 26:213-217.
  • 10Knop C, Fabian HF, Bastian L, et al. Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting. Spine, 2001, 26. 88-99.

二级参考文献3

共引文献282

同被引文献828

引证文献89

二级引证文献516

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部