期刊文献+

体外药敏试验ATP-TCA与流式细胞仪在肝癌化疗中的应用 被引量:17

Application of in vitro ATP-TCA and FCM in chemotherapy of primary liver cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨体外化疗药敏试验系统 (ATP TCA系统 )联合流式细胞仪 (FCM )在肝癌化疗中的应用及其结果之间的关系。方法 取 2 4例肝癌切除、活检或穿刺组织行体外药敏试验和流式细胞仪P170 检测 ,并分析二者间的关系。结果 ATP TCA的可评估率为 91 6 7% ;10种化疗药物的敏感率分别为 :氟尿嘧啶 5 0 0 %、诺消灵 5 0 0 %、顺铂 14 2 6 %、足叶乙甙 19 0 5 %、草酸铂 19 0 5 %、丝裂霉素 2 3 81%、表阿霉素 2 8 5 7%、开普拓 45 46 %、健择 47 6 2 %、泰素 6 3 6 4% ;P170 检测阳性率为 5 7 14% ;丝裂霉素、表阿霉素的敏感率在P170 阴性表达时高 ,开普拓、健择、泰素的敏感率高且在P170 阳性表达和阴性表达时无显著差异。结论 ATP TCA法联合FCM可较好用于肝癌化疗药物的筛选 ;丝裂霉素、表阿霉素可用于P170 阴性表达的病人 ,开普拓、健择、泰素可用于P170 阳性表达的病人。 Objective To study the application of in vitro ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) and flow cytometry (FCM) in chemotherapy of primary liver cancer. Methods The specimens of primary liver cancer from 24 patients were tested by ATP-TCA and FCM. Results Evaluable test results were achieved in 22 of the 24 patients and the evaluability was 91.6%. The sensitive rates of 5-Fluoruracil (5-Fu), mitoxantron (MIT), cisplatin (CDDP), etoposid (Vp-16), oxaliplatin (OXA), mitomycin C (MMC), epirubicin (EPI), irinotecan (CPT), gemcitabine (GEM) and paclitaxl (TAX) were 5.00%, 5.00%, 14.29%, 19.05%, 19.05%, 23.81%, 28.57%, 45.46%, 47.62% and 63.60%, respectively. The positive rate of P 170 was 57.14%. The sensitive rates of MMC and EPI were higher in P 170 negative patients than in P 170 positive ones. The sensitive rates of CPT, GEM and TAX were high and there was no difference in sensitivity between different P 170 expression patterns. Conclusions ATP-CTA and FCM can be applied in screening of chemotherapeutic agents for primary liver cancer. MMC and EPI can be used in patients with negative P 170 expression and CPT, GEM and TAX in those with positive P 170 expression.
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2002年第12期728-731,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基金 广东省社会发展重大科技项目 (NO :2KM 0 45 0S)
关键词 体外药敏试验 ATP-TCA 流式细胞仪 肝癌 化疗 多耐药基因 Carcinoma, hepatocellular In vitro chemosensitivity assay Flow cytometry Primary liver cancer Multidrug resistance P 170
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1尹格平,孙晓明,陈诵芬.恶性实体瘤细胞多药耐药基因(MDR_1)表达产物流式细胞术检测方法的建立及临床意义[J].中国肿瘤临床,1998,25(7):489-491. 被引量:13
  • 2唐超明,李汉贤.肿瘤化疗药物敏感性测定与肾包膜下移植法[J].国外医学(肿瘤学分册),2000,27(6):349-352. 被引量:6
  • 3Cree IA, Kurbacher CM, Untch M, et al. Correlation of the clinical response to chemotherapy in breast cancer with ex vivo chem osensitivity. Anticancer Drugs, 1996,7: 630-635.
  • 4Maehara Y, Anai H, Tamada R, et al. The ATP assay is more sensitive than the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test for predicting cell viability. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 1987,23 : 273 276.
  • 5Petty RD, Sutherland LA, Hunter EM, et al. Comparison of MTT and ATP-based assays for the measurement of viable cell number. J Biolumin Chemilumin, 1995,10: 29-34.
  • 6Hanauske AR. In vitro assays for antitumor activity: more pitfalls to come? Eur J Cancer, 1993,29A: 1502-1503.
  • 7Pacliacci MC, Spinozzi F, Miglioratic G, et al. Genistein inhibits tumor cell growth in vitro but enhances mitochondrial reduction of tetrazolium salts: a further pitfall in the use of the MTT assay for evaluating cell growth and survival. Eur J Cancer, 1993,29A:1573-1577.
  • 8周际昌.实用肿瘤内科学(第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.177.

二级参考文献4

共引文献21

同被引文献113

引证文献17

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部