期刊文献+

0.25%罗比卡因在小儿骶管阻滞应用效果探讨

Use of 0.25% ropivacaine in paediatric caudal block
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 :评价 0 2 5 %罗比卡因应用于小儿骶管阻滞的安全性和有效性。方法 :80例 1~ 8岁 ,行下肢、会阴手术患儿随机分为两组 :罗比卡因组 (R组 ,n =4 0 )和布比卡因组 (B组 ,n =4 0 )。两组均在基础麻醉后行骶管阻滞 ,分别注入 0 2 5 %罗比卡因 (R组 )和 0 2 5 %布比卡因 (B组 ) 0 8ml kg。测定骶管阻滞的起效时间和镇痛时间 ,记录HR、MAP和SpO2 及追加镇痛药 ,并观察出现的副反应。结果 :各组术中均无须追加镇痛药 ,麻醉效果满意。R组与B组的起效时间 (7 6± 2 3minvs 8 2±2 6min)和镇痛时间 (32 2± 4 7minvs 2 98± 6 5min)相比较 ,均无显著性差异 (P >0 0 5 )。未观察到局麻药的毒性反应。结论 :0 2 5 %罗比卡因 (0 8ml kg)可提供满意的小儿骶管阻滞麻醉 ;同浓度、同剂量的罗比卡因和布比卡因用于小儿骶管阻滞 。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and reliability of 0 25% ropivacaine in paediatric caudal block.Methods:80 children aged 1~8 yr undergoing elective lower limb or perinei surgery were randomly allocated to receive caudal block of 0 8ml/kg of either 0 25% ropivacaine(R group,n=40)or 0 25% bupivacaine(B group,n=40).All blocks were placed after induction of light general anaesthesia.Parameters investigated included onset time and analgesia duration of the cadual block.Heart rate,arterial pressure and oxygen saturation were measured every 5 min after administration of local anaesthetic.Adding analgesic and its adverse events were recorded.Results:No further analgesic were required during operation in the two groups.Onset times(R group:7 6±2 3min,B group:8 2±2 6min)and analgesia duration(R group:322±47min;B group:298±65min)were not significantly different between the two groups(p>0 05).No adverse events were observed.Conclusions:0 25% ropivacaine(0 8ml/kg)is well tolerated and provides effective analgesia when given for paediatric caudal block.Ropivacaine produces similar effect as bupivacaine with equal concentration and dosage.
出处 《广西医学》 CAS 2003年第1期5-6,共2页 Guangxi Medical Journal
关键词 罗比卡因 骶管阻滞 小儿 麻醉 布比卡因 Ropivacaine Caudal block Anesthesia,paediatric Bupivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacainecompared with that of bupivacairie. Anesth Analg 1989; 69:563
  • 2[2]Hannallah RS, Broadman LM, Belman AB, et al. Comparison of caudal and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for control of post orchiopexy pain in pediatric ambulatory surgery. Anesthesi ology 1987;66:832
  • 3[3]Brown DL, Ransom DM, Hall JA, et al. Regional anesthesia and local anesthetic - induced systemic toxicity: seizure frequency and accompanying cardiovascul ar changes. Anesth Anal1995;81:321
  • 4[4]Ved SA, Pinosky M, Nicodemus H. Ventricular tachycardia and brief cardiovascular collapse in two infants after caudal anesthesia using a bupivacaine- epinephrine solution. Anesthesiology 1993;79:1121
  • 5[5]Kohane DS,Sankar WN, Shubina M,et al. Sciatic nerve block ade in infant, adolescent, and adult rats. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:1199
  • 6[6]lvani G, Lampugnani E, Torre M, et al. Comparison of ropiva caine for paediatric caudal block. Br J Anaesth 1998;81:247
  • 7[7]Khalil S, Campos C, Farag AM, et al. Caudal block in children (Ropivacaine compared with bupivacaine). Anesthesiology 1999;91:1279
  • 8[8]Conceicao MJD, Coclho L. Caudal anaesthesia with 0.375 % ropivacaine or 0. 375 % bupivacaine in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80:507
  • 9[9]Koinig H, Krenn CG, Glaser C, et al. The dose- response of caudal ropivacaine in children. Anesthesiology 1999; 90 :1339

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部