期刊文献+

全过程工程咨询团队间知识边界对知识融合意愿的影响

Research on the Impact of Knowledge Boundaries among the Whole Process Engineering Consulting Teams on the Willingness of Knowledge Integration
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 全过程工程咨询作为知识密集型服务,其成果的交付需要不同专业咨询团队间的知识融合,但又不可避免地面临知识边界。基于知识边界理论,分析全过程工程咨询团队间多层级知识边界(语法、语义和语用边界)对知识融合意愿的影响,旨在促进咨询团队间知识融合。对179个全过程工程咨询项目问卷调查数据进行回归分析发现,语法边界对知识融合意愿影响不显著,语义边界和语用边界正向影响知识融合意愿。此外,语用边界在语义边界和知识融合意愿间起到部分中介作用。本研究丰富了全过程工程咨询领域关于知识边界和知识融合的理论,为实践管理提供参考。 As a knowledge-intensive service,whole-process engineering consulting urgently requires knowledge integration among specialty-specific consulting teams for delivering outcomes,yet it inevitably faces knowledge boundaries.Based on the knowledge boundary theory,this study analyzes the impact of multi-level knowledge boundaries(syntactic,semantic,pragmatic)on the willingness to integrate knowledge,aiming to promote knowledge integration.Regression analysis on questionnaire survey data from 179 whole-process engineering consulting projects reveals that syntactic boundaries have no significant impact on the willingness to integrate knowledge,while semantic boundaries and pragmatic boundaries positively affect it.Additionally,pragmatic boundaries play a partial mediating role between semantic boundaries and the willingness to integrate knowledge.This study enriches the theories related to knowledge boundaries and knowledge integration in the whole-process engineering consulting area,and provides useful implications for practical management.
作者 张宇彤 许佳骅 张苏娟 李亚迪 ZHANG Yutong;XU Jiahua;ZHANG Sujuan;LI Yadi(School of Business,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China;University of Melbourne,Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology,Melbourne 3053,Australia;School of Project Management,The University of Sydney,Sydney 2037,Australia)
出处 《建筑经济》 2026年第4期82-89,共8页 Construction Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目“多重嵌入视角下全过程工程咨询项目知识融合治理研究”(72301103) 国家自然科学基金面上项目“面向ESG绩效的大型基础设施业主项目能力演化机理研究”(72471201) 上海市白玉兰人才计划浦江项目“高质量发展导向下城市更新项目价值交付治理研究”(23PJC024)。
关键词 全过程工程咨询 知识边界 知识融合意愿 问卷调查 中介效应 whole-process engineering consulting knowledge boundaries knowledge integration willingness questionnaire survey mediating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1徐进,王前.基于FAHP方法的企业隐性知识共享最优心理契约类型研究[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,34(2):34-39. 被引量:1
  • 2苗东升.系统科学论[J].系统科学学报,1998,12(4):7-10. 被引量:14
  • 3张志学,Paul S.Hempel,韩玉兰,邱静.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):271-280. 被引量:68
  • 4BRANDON D P, HOLLINGSHEAD A B. Transaetive memo- ry systems in organizations:matching tasks expertise,and peo- ple[J]. Organization Science, 2004,15 (6) : 633-644.
  • 5JACKSON P,KLOBAS J. Transactive memory systems in organizations: implications for knowledge directories [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2008,44 : 409-424.
  • 6NEVO D, WAND Y. Organizational memory information systems:a transactive memory approach[J]. Decision Sup- port Systems, 2005,39 : 549-562.
  • 7LEWIS K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams:a longitudinal study of transactive memory systems[J]. Management Science,2004,50(11) :1519-1533.
  • 8CARLILE P. Transferring, translating and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across bounda- ries[J]. Organization Science, 2004,15 (5) ~ 555-568.
  • 9CARLILE P R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries:boundary objects in new product development [J]. Organization Science,2002,13(4) :442-455.
  • 10KOTLARSKY J, HOOFF B, HUYSMAN M. Bridging Knowledge Boundaries in Cross-Functional Groups~The Role of a Transaetive Memory System [EB/OL]. http: ff aisel, aisnet, org/icis2009/]/, 2014-09-25.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部