摘要
文化主体性是中华文化长期发展呈现出的重要属性。当前,数字技术的深度渗透重构了文化生产、传播与消费的全链条,既为文化主体性的彰显提供了技术赋能,也因技术逻辑的霸权化导致了主体性异化、认同碎片化等适配困境。本研究以“动态适配”为核心分析框架,立足哲学主体性理论、文化研究与数字技术批判的交叉视角,界定文化主体性的“自主性—能动性—反思性”三维内涵,揭示“信息茧房”、创作权稀释、数字身份焦虑等适配失衡的具体表现及其成因,进而构建“价值—认知—实践”三位一体的动态适配模型,阐释技术迭代、主体需求、制度规范与文化自觉的协同驱动机制,从技术设计、主体素养、制度治理与文化传承四个维度,提出实现数字技术与文化主体良性互动的优化路径。研究表明,数字技术与文化主体性的适配并非静态平衡,而是在“技术赋能—主体反思—制度调节”的循环中不断趋近动态协调的过程,其核心在于确立“以人为本”的技术伦理,保障主体在数字文化实践中的自主性与创造性。
Cultural subjectivity is an essential attribute formed through the long-term practice of Chinese culture.At present,the in-depth penetration of digital technology has reconstructed the entire chain of cultural production,communication and consumption.It not only provides technical empowerment for the manifestation of cultural subjectivity,but also leads to adaptation dilemmas such as the alienation of subjectivity and the fragmentation of identity due to the hegemonization of technical logic.This study takes“dynamic adaptation”as the core analytical framework,and defines the three-dimensional connotation of“autonomy–initiative–reflectiveness”of cultural subjectivity from the perspectives of philosophical subjectivity theory,cultural studies and digital technology criticism.It reveals the specific manifestations and causes of adaptation imbalances such as“information cocoons”,dilution of creative rights,and digital identity anxiety.Furthermore,it constructs a trinity dynamic adaptation model of“value–cognition–practice”.It explains the collaborative driving mechanism of technological iteration,subject demand,institutional norms and cultural consciousness,and proposes an optimization path for achieving a positive interaction between digital technology and cultural subjects from four dimensions:technological design,subject literacy,institutional governance,and cultural inheritance.The study shows that the adaptation between digital technology and cultural subjectivity is not a static balance,but a process that constantly approaches dynamic coordination in the cycle of“technological empowerment–subject reflection–institutional regulation”.Its core lies in establishing a people-oriented technological ethics and safeguarding the autonomy and creativity of subjects in digital cultural practice.
作者
张仁枫
ZHANG Renfeng(School of Marxism,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610207;Institute of the History of the Communist Party of China and Party Building,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610207)
出处
《长白学刊》
2026年第2期141-156,共16页
Changbai Journal
基金
甘孜州哲学社会科学重点研究基地“甘孜红色文化研究中心”重点项目“多维视角下红军长征甘孜段历史资源赋能红色旅游高质量发展研究”(GZHSWH2025ZD01)
国家社科基金重大项目“坚持党的文化领导权研究”(24&WZD08)。
关键词
数字技术
文化主体性
动态适配
算法伦理
文化治理
Digital Technology
Cultural Subjectivity
Dynamic Adaptation
Algorithmic Ethics
Cultural Governance
