摘要
唯物史观视域下,对比分析黑格尔与马克思关于历史规律的论述,在宏观叙事中,历史规律在历史实际进程中表现为一定要贯彻下去的历史必然性,不以人的主观意志为转移;在微观叙事中,历史规律在历史实际进程中表现为到底通过什么历史事件贯彻下去取决于历史主体性,具有选择性。历史必然性与历史主体性的逻辑统一贯穿一个文明的历史并决定其未来命运。所以,宏观上看历史必然性一定要通过某个历史事件贯彻下去;但微观上看具体通过哪个历史事件贯彻历史必然性,取决于历史主体性作用。如果一个历史事件未能贯彻历史必然性,还会发生新的历史事件,直到彻底贯彻历史必然性为止。近代以来的重大历史事件和党史叙事确证了这一结论。
Comparing the discussions of historical laws by Hegel and Marx,the macro-narrative from the perspective of historical materialism shows that historical laws manifest as historical necessity in the actual course of history,which must be carried out and is not subject to human subjective will.The micro-narrative from the perspective of historical materialism shows that the historical necessity is ultimately realized through certain historical events,which depends on historical subjectivity and is selective.Correctly understanding the logical relationship between historical necessity,which runs through a civilization’s history and determines its future fate,and historical subjectivity:on a macro level,historical necessity must be realized through a certain historical event,but on a micro level,the specific historical event through which historical necessity is realized depends on the role of historical subjectivity.Logically speaking,if a historical event fails to realize historical necessity,new historical events will occur until historical necessity is fully realized.Major historical events and the narrative of the Party’s history since modern times have confirmed this conclusion.
作者
万丽华
WAN Li-hua(Institute of Historical Materialism and Chinese Civilization,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing Jiangsu 210044,China)
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2025年第11期1-6,共6页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学研究基金重大招标项目“中华文明的演进道路与内在机制研究”(22&ZD015)。
关键词
唯物史观
历史规律
历史必然性
宏观叙事
微观叙事
historical materialism
historical law
historical necessity
macro-narrative
micro-narrative
