摘要
With the continuous progress of automatic driving technology,automatic driving technology standards are gradually affecting the determination of criminal responsibility for traffic accidents in China.At present,the characteristics and tendency of China's automatic driving technology standards present the situation of high policy relevance coexisting with low normative binding,professionalism coexist with barriers,forefront coexist with ambiguity.Therefore,challenges are presented both theoretically and practically on the determination of criminal responsibility based on automatic driving technology standard..In this regard,the misunderstanding should be clarified in theory:The legal order under the automatic driving technology standard has constitutionality and systematic,and there is a balance between the frontier of automatic driving technology development and the lagging of criminal law.The automatic driving technology risk level system should be built to clarify the boundary of the effectiveness of criminal law norms,seeking fora breakthrough in the application of the establishment of a comprehensive judgment system of the risks and accidents and the system of evidence to prove the system,which clarifies the determination of criminal responsibility under the automatic driving technology standard.This essay hopes to pursue breakthroughs in the application-to establish a comprehensive judgment system of risks and accidents as well as an evidence proof system,so as to clarify the determination of criminal responsibility under automatic driving technology standards.
随着自动驾驶技术的不断进步,自动驾驶技术标准正逐渐影响着我国对交通事故刑事责任的认定。当前,我国自动驾驶技术标准的特点及倾向呈现强政策相关性与弱规范约束力并存,前沿性与模糊性并存,专业性与壁垒并存的局面。基于此,自动驾驶技术标准对交通事故刑事责任的认定存在理论与实践上的挑战。对此,在理论上澄清误区:自动驾驶技术标准下的法秩序具备合宪性与体系性,自动驾驶技术发展前沿性同罪刑法定滞后性之间存在平衡的空间,并构建自动驾驶技术风险等级体系明确刑法规范效力边界;在适用中寻求突破:建立风险与事故综合判断体系以及证据证明体系,据此明确自动驾驶技术标准下的刑事责任认定。
出处
《科技与法律(中英文)》
2026年第1期134-148,共15页
Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基金
The National Social Science Foundation Youth Project of China:Research on the collaborative govemance path of administrative law and criminal law against dangerous driving behaviors in the digital-intelligent society(25CFX108)。
