期刊文献+

基于真实世界数据的创新药医保战略购买长效机制研究

Research on Long-Term Mechanism for Strategic Purchasing of Innovative Drugs Based on Real-World Data
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 高值创新药的快速涌现及其价值的动态演变特征,对医保基金“保基本”与“促创新”的平衡构成了现实挑战。本研究系统剖析医保在决策风险、基金承受力、风险分担及价值识别等方面的现实困境,构建涵盖临床、经济、社会与创新价值的综合评估框架,并以此为基础,提出依托真实世界数据建立以价值为导向的长效购买机制。该机制包括建立基于价值评估的风险分担合同、创新多元支付方式以及药品价格动态调整,旨在推动医保战略购买从静态准入决策向动态价值管理的转型,在保障基金可持续的同时,有效激励医药创新。 The rapid emergence of high-value innovative medicines and the dynamic evolution of their value characteristics pose real challenges to the balance between“basic coverage”and“innovation promotion”within medical insurance funds.This study systematically examines the practical dilemmas faced by medical insurance in terms of decision-making risk,fund affordability,risk sharing,and value identification,and constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework encompassing clinical,economic,social,and innovation value.On this basis,it proposes the establishment of a value-oriented long-term purchasing mechanism supported by real-world data,including value-based risk-sharing agreements,innovative and diversified payment models,and dynamic drug price adjustment mechanisms.The aim is to promote a transformation of medical insurance strategic purchasing from static access decisions to dynamic value management,thereby ensuring fund sustainability while effectively incentivizing pharmaceutical innovation.
出处 《中国医疗保险》 2026年第2期34-41,共8页 China Health Insurance
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“医保支持创新药发展的成效评估与长效机制研究”(25CGL122) 国家自然科学基金项目“临终前医疗支出水平及其经济效率的实证评价”(72273094)。
关键词 创新药 真实世界数据 价值评估 医保战略购买 长效机制 innovative drugs real-world data value assessment strategic purchasing in medical insurance long-term mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献77

  • 1刘阳.也说“性价比”[J].沈阳大学学报,2004,16(1):32-33. 被引量:3
  • 2吴传俭.道德风险与我国社会医疗保险基金安全问题分析[J].中国卫生经济,2005,24(11):47-48. 被引量:13
  • 3唐芸霞.医疗费用增长对医疗保险基金的影响及对策研究[J].江西财经大学学报,2007(4):32-37. 被引量:13
  • 4刘剑萍,梁木.医疗保险基金支出影响因素分析——以西安市为例[J].新西部(理论版),2007(10X):35-36. 被引量:3
  • 5何建志.全民健康保险价量协议法律问题分析[J].台大法学论丛,2014,43(2):381-417.
  • 6de Pouvourville G. Risk-sharing agreements for innovative drugs[J]. The European Journal of Health E- conomics, 2006, 7(3): 155-157.
  • 7Ethgen O. Risk-sharing: The Need to Think Differently [EB/OL]. http://www.ispor.org/news/articles/ May -June2011/Risk -sharing -The -Need -to -Think - Differently.asp, 2011.
  • 8Adamski J, Godman B, et al. Risk sharing ar- rangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considera- tions and recommendations for European payers [J]. BMC health services research, 2010, 10(1): 153.
  • 9Towse A, Garrison Jr L P. Can't get no satis- faction? Will pay for performance help? [J]. Pharma- coeconomics, 2010, 28(2): 93-102.
  • 10Klemp M, Frznsdal K B, Facey K. What princi- ples should govern the use of managed entry agree- ments? [J]. International journal of technology assess- merit in health care, 2011, 27(1): 77-83.

共引文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部