期刊文献+

经颅多普勒超声监测在颈动脉内膜切除术中的应用价值:单中心回顾性研究

Clinical value of transcranial Doppler monitoring in carotid endarterectomy:a single-center retrospective study
原文传递
导出
摘要 背景与目的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是治疗颈动脉狭窄的主要手段,但术中血流阻断及术后再灌注可能导致脑梗死及脑高灌注综合征(CHS)等神经系统并发症。如何在围手术期实时、动态评估脑灌注状态并指导个体化管理,仍缺乏统一有效的监测手段。本研究旨在评估经颅多普勒超声(TCD)监测在CEA围手术期安全性保障及远期预后改善中的临床价值。方法回顾性分析2022年2月—2024年12月在中南大学湘雅二医院血管外科接受CEA的患者资料。根据围手术期是否应用TCD监测分为TCD组和非TCD组。比较两组患者的基线特征、围手术期处理、并发症发生情况及远期随访结局,并对TCD监测下脑血流动力学变化进行分析。结果共纳入53例患者,其中TCD组25例,非TCD组28例。两组患者在年龄、性别及主要危险因素方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。手术时间、住院时间及术中转流使用率在两组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后30 d内,TCD组未发生短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)及CHS,非TCD组分别发生2例TIA和3例CHS。随访期间,TCD组未发生不良事件,非TCD组发生2例不良事件。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,TCD组3.5年内无不良事件生存率明显高于非TCD组(P=0.047)。结论CEA术中应用TCD监测与更优的远期无不良事件生存率显著相关。TCD可通过实时评估脑血流动力学变化,识别低灌注及脑高灌注高危患者,并指导围手术期精细化管理,具有重要的临床应用价值。 Background and Aims Carotid endarterectomy(CEA)is a primary treatment for carotid artery stenosis;however,intraoperative carotid clamping and postoperative reperfusion may lead to neurological complications such as cerebral infarction and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome(CHS).An effective and standardized strategy for real-time,dynamic assessment of cerebral perfusion and individualized perioperative management is still lacking.This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of transcranial Doppler(TCD)monitoring in improving perioperative safety and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing CEA.Methods Patients who underwent CEA at the Department of Vascular Surgery,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between February 2022 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the use of perioperative TCD monitoring,patients were divided into the TCD group and the non-TCD group.Baseline characteristics,perioperative management,complication rates,and long-term follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.Cerebral hemodynamic changes monitored by TCD were also analyzed.Results A total of 53 patients were included,with 25 in the TCD group and 28 in the non-TCD group.No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age,sex,or major risk factors(all P>0.05).Operative time,length of hospital stay,and intraoperative shunt use were comparable between the two groups(all P>0.05).Within 30 days postoperatively,no transient ischemic attacks(TIA)or CHS occurred in the TCD group,whereas 2 cases of TIA and 3 cases of CHS were observed in the non-TCD group.During follow-up,no adverse events occurred in the TCD group,while 2 adverse events were recorded in the non-TCD group.Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 3.5-year event-free survival rate was significantly higher in the TCD group than in the non-TCD group(P=0.047).Conclusion The use of TCD monitoring during CEA is significantly associated with improved long-term event-free survival.By enabling real-time assessment of cerebral hemodynamics,TCD facilitates identification of patients at high risk for cerebral hypoperfusion and hyperperfusion and guides refined perioperative management,thereby providing substantial clinical value.
作者 张雄 邱剑 黎明 李全明 舒畅 何昊 ZHANG Xiong;QIU Jian;LI Ming;LI Quanming;SHU Chang;HE Hao(Department of Vascular Surgery,the Second Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410011,China;Institute of Vascular Diseases,Central South University,Changsha 410011,China;Center of Vascular Surgery,Fuwai Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100037,China)
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 北大核心 2025年第12期2586-2595,共10页 China Journal of General Surgery
基金 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2024JJ9215)。
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 颈动脉内膜切除术 超声检查 多普勒 经颅 血流动力学 Carotid Stenosis Endarterectomy,Carotid Ultrasonography,Doppler,Transcranial Hemodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献100

  • 1Yongjun Wang,Jing Jing,Xia Meng,Yuesong Pan,Yilong Wang,Xingquan Zhao,Jinxi Lin,Wei Li,Yong Jiang,Zixiao Li,Xinmiao Zhang,Xiaomeng Yang,Ruijun Ji,Chunjuan Wang,Zhimin Wang,Xinsheng Han,Songdi Wu,Zhengchang Jia,Yongming Chen,Hao Li.The Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-Ⅲ) for patients with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: design, rationale and baseline patient characteristics[J].Stroke & Vascular Neurology,2019,4(3):158-164. 被引量:93
  • 2章希炜,杨宏宇,孙蓬,邹君杰,陈国玉.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗动脉粥样硬化性颈内动脉闭塞症[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(10):727-728. 被引量:4
  • 3[1]Harrison MJ,Marshall J.The variable clinical and CT findings after carotid occlusion:the role of collateral blood supply.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1998,51:269-272.
  • 4[5]Lindegaard KF,Bakke SJ,Grolimund P,et al.Assessment of intracranial hemodynamics in carotid artery disease by transcranial Doppler ultrasound.J Neurosurg,1985,63:890-898.
  • 5[6]Hu HH,Wang S,Chem CM,et al.Clinical significance of the ophthalmic artery in carotid artery disease.Acta Neurol Scand,1995,92:242-246.
  • 6黄一宁,高山,王莉鹃,汪波.闭塞性脑血管病经颅多谱勒超声和脑血管造影的比较[J].中华神经科杂志,1997,30(2):98-101. 被引量:176
  • 7McClelland S 3 rd. Multimodality management of carotid artery stenosis: reviewing the class-I evidence [ J ]. J Natl Med Assoc, 2007, 99 ( 11 ) : 1235 - 1242.
  • 8Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E, et al. 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis ( ACST-1 ) : a multicentre randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2010, 376(9746) :1074- 1084.
  • 9Saw J, Bajzer C, Casserly IP, et al. Evaluating the optimal activated clotting time during carotid artery stenting [ J ] . Am J Cardiol, 2006, 97(11) :1657 -1660.
  • 10Schneider JR, Droste JS, Schindler N, et al. Carotid endarterectomy with routine electroencephalography and selective shunting: Influence of contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion and utility in prevention of perioperative strokes [ J ] . J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35(6) :1114-1122.

共引文献312

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部