期刊文献+

基于遥感与GIS技术的淮南大通区崩塌易发性评价

Collapse susceptibility evaluation in Datong District of Huainan based on remote sensing and GIS technology
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以淮南市大通区北部丘陵为研究对象,基于遥感数据提取和地理信息系统(GIS)空间分析技术,结合综合指数法与层次分析法,对该区域的崩塌易发性进行评价。选取坡度、高程、工程岩组、地质构造、斜坡结构5项地质环境因素作为评价因子,通过层次分析法确定权重,并利用综合指数法进行计算。结果表明,崩塌易发性主要分布在高程大于200 m、坡度大于15°的区域,且多位于地貌起伏的山地。低易发区面积为2.76 km2,占研究区面积的14.1%,非易发区面积为12.15 km^(2),占研究区面积的85.9%。模型精度指标小于0.1,符合真实情况,表明基于遥感与GIS技术的崩塌易发性评价结果可靠。 This study focused on the northern hilly area of Datong District,Huainan City.Using remote sensing data extrac⁃tion and geographic information system(GIS)spatial analysis technology,combined with the comprehensive index method and analytic hierarchy process(AHP),the collapse susceptibility of the region was evaluated.Five geological environmental factors—slope,elevation,engineering rock group,geological structure,and slope structure—were selected as evaluation fac⁃tors.The weights were determined using AHP,and calculations were made using the comprehensive index method.The results show that collapse susceptibility is mainly distributed in areas with an elevation greater than 200 m and a slope greater than 15°,most of which are located in mountainous areas with undulating topography.The low susceptibility area covers 2.76 km^(2),accounting for 14.1%of the study area,while the non-susceptible area covers 12.15 km^(2),accounting for 85.9%.The model’s accuracy index is less than 0.1,which aligns with the real situation,indicating that the collapse suscep⁃tibility evaluation results based on remote sensing and GIS technology are reliable.
作者 高山 GAO Shan(Anhui Province Coal Field Geological Survey Water Conservancy Exploration Team,Suzhou,Anhui 234000,China)
出处 《北京测绘》 2026年第1期70-74,共5页 Beijing Surveying and Mapping
关键词 遥感技术 地理信息系统 综合指数法 层析分析法 易发性评价 remote sensing technology geographic information system(GIS) comprehensive index method analytic hierarchy process(AHP) susceptibility evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献97

  • 1郑建中,邹正明.皖南山区环境地质特征与滑坡地质灾害防治[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(1):102-105. 被引量:24
  • 2王哲,易发成.基于层次分析法的绵阳市地质灾害易发性评价[J].水文地质工程地质,2007,34(3):93-98. 被引量:39
  • 3天津系统工程教研室.层次分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.42-60.
  • 4http://baike.baidu.com/view/1157855.htm.
  • 5http://www.weather.com.cn/static/html/article/20080910/13114.shtml.
  • 6中华人民共和国国土资源部.中国地质环境公报.2002.
  • 7中华人民共和国国土资源部.中国地质环境公报.2003.
  • 8Aldo Clerici. A GRASS GIS based Shell script for Landslide Susceptibilityzonation by the Conditional Analysis method[J ]. Proceedings of the Open source GIS-GRASS users conference, 2002(5) :38-40.
  • 9S. LEE. Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boun [ J ]. REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 ( 11 ) : 2037-2052.
  • 10Hans-Balder Havenith. Analysis of landslide susceptibility in the Suusamyr region, Tien Shan: statistical and geotechnical approach, Landslides, 2006 (3) : 39-50.

共引文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部