期刊文献+

高职院校“专创融合”教育研究的演进脉络与优化路径——基于CNKI数据库(2013-2023)的文献计量分析

Evolution and Optimization Pathways of“Specialty-Innovation-Entrepreneurship Integration”Education Research in Higher Vocational Colleges:A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the CNKI Database(2013-2023)
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 高职院校“专创融合”历经多年发展,已经逐步构建全方位、多层次,囊括多个专业的创新创业教育培养体系。以CNKI数据库2013-2023年收录的996篇高职院校“专创融合”主题文献为样本,运用文献计量法,从发文量趋势、学术合作网络、机构分布、期刊载文特征及基金支持等方面展开可视化分析。结果显示:研究热度呈现政策驱动型波动增长,核心作者群尚未形成,区域研究能力差异显著等问题。成因涉及制度设计与执行层面的结构性矛盾、学术生产机制与知识创新能力的系统性缺陷、资源整合壁垒与认知惯习的交互性制约等。对此,建议通过制度重构与政策赋能的顶层设计、学术共同体与知识生产体系的协同升级、产教融合与资源整合的生态化重构、评价体系与创新范式的双向突破等对策,推动“专创融合”教育的理论深化与实践创新。 After years of development,the“specialty-innovation-entrepreneurship integration”initiative in higher vocational colleges has gradually formed a comprehensive,multi-level innovation and entrepreneurship education system covering a wide range of specialties.Taking 996 papers themed on“specialty-innovation-entrepreneurship integration”in higher vocational colleges,which were included in the CNKI database from 2013 to 2023,as the research sample,this study adopts the bibliometric method to conduct a visual analysis from the aspects of the publication volume trend,academic cooperation network,institutional distribution,journal publication characteristics and fund support.Findings indicate that the research attention shows a policy-driven fluctuating growth,with such problems as the lack of a formed core author group and obvious regional gaps in research capabilities.The causes involve structural contradictions in institutional design and implementation,systematic defects in academic production mechanisms and knowledge innovation capabilities,and interactive constraints between resource integration barriers and cognitive habitus.To address these issues,it is suggested to promote the theoretical deepening and practical innovation of“specialty-innovation-entrepreneurship integration”education through such countermeasures as the top-level design of institutional reconstruction and policy empowerment,the coordinated upgrading of academic communities and knowledge production systems,the ecological reconstruction of industry-education integration and resource integration,and a two-way breakthrough in evaluation systems and innovative paradigms.
作者 龙冬 候鹤楠 LONG Dong;HOU Henan(Office of Academic Affairs,Changchun University,Changchun 130022,China)
机构地区 长春大学教务处
出处 《苏州市职业大学学报》 2025年第4期38-43,共6页 Journal of Suzhou Vocational University
基金 吉林省教育科学“十四五”规划2025年度一般课题《产教融合视域下“专创融合”创新人才培养路径研究》(GH25134)。
关键词 创新创业 高职 专创融合 文献计量 innovation and entrepreneurship higher vocational education specialty-innovation-entrepreneurship integration bibliometrics
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献76

  • 1陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,胡志刚,王贤文.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. 被引量:9337
  • 2艾尔玛·阿德尔曼:《发展理论中的误区及其对政策的含义》,载杰拉尔德·迈耶、约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨主编.《发展经济学前沿未来展望》,中国财政经济出版社2003年版.
  • 3赛义德·尤素福,约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨.《发展问题:已解决的问题和未解决的问题》,见杰拉尔德·迈耶,约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨所编.《发展经济学前沿:未来展望》,北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003年,第162-191页.
  • 4迪利普·慕克吉.《发展经济学的理论是否太少》[J].比较,2007,(28).
  • 5Hall,R.E.,& Jones,C.I.,Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114(1),83-116.
  • 6Acemoglu,Daron; Johnson,Simon and Robinson,James.The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development:An Empirical Investigation.American Economic Review,2001,91(5),pp.1369-401.
  • 7考希克·巴苏.《新实证发展经济学:对其哲学基础的评论》[J].比较,2007,(28).
  • 8阿比吉特·班纳吉.《新发展经济学及其理论挑战》[J].比较,2007,(28).
  • 9Fine,Ben,New Growth Theory:More problem than solution,in Jomo K.S.and Fine,Ben.(Eds.),The New Development Economics:After the Washington Consensus,London and New York:Zed Books.2006,pp.68-86.
  • 10Waeyenberge,E.V.,From Washington to Post-Washington Consensus:Illusions of Development,in Jomo K.S.and Fine,Ben,ed.,The New Development Economics:After the Washington Consensus,London and New York:Zed Books.2006,pp.21-45.

共引文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部