期刊文献+

大型数字平台反垄断审查中公共利益的判断

The Judgment of Public Interest in the Antitrust Review of Large Digital Platforms
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 大型数字平台凭借数据与算法优势重构市场竞争逻辑,导致反垄断法传统分析框架在公共利益判断中陷入多重困境,呈现出规范结构性离散、传统评价方法失灵以及功能性犹疑等问题。公共利益判断必须适应数字平台多边性与生态化的特征,将公共利益划分为以消费者福利为核心层以及创新生态为扩展层的多元价值体系,并在程序上构建技术赋能下的参与式审查机制。对于公共利益的实体判断,竞争机构可从结构性、效果性及可量化等三维角度来认定公共利益是否受到大型数字平台的实质性影响,推动反垄断审查从个案裁决转向系统性治理。在程序上,竞争机构应根据垄断行为的性质和类型,分别按照合理性原则或本身违法原则来判断公共利益影响的存在,以弥合公共利益判断的规范性与技术性鸿沟。 Large digital platforms are reshaping the logic of market competition by leveraging their advantages in data and algorithms.This transformation has introduced multiple challenges to the traditional antitrust framework,particularly in the assessment of public interest.These challenges include the fragmentation of the structure of public interest,the failure of traditional evaluation mechanisms,and the uncertainty surrounding its functional role.To address these issues,the judgment of public interest must adapt to the specific characteristics of the digital platform economy,such as its multilateral nature,ecosystem-based structure,and dynamic competition.Public interest should be conceptualized as a multi-dimensional value system,with a core focus on consumer welfare and an extended layer emphasizing innovation ecosystems.In terms of procedural design,a participatory review mechanism,empowered by technology,should be established.Substantively,the judgment of public interest can be evaluated through three dimensions:structural impact,effectiveness,and quantifiability.These dimensions can help determine the significant influence that large digital platforms may have on public interest,thus shifting antitrust review from individual case adjudication to systemic governance.With regard to procedural judgment,competition institutions should assess the impact on public interest either through the legitimacy reasoning or the rule of per se illegality,depending on the nature and type of monopolistic conduct.This approach will help bridge the normative and technical gaps in the evaluation of public interest.
作者 姚保松 YAO Baosong(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
机构地区 郑州大学法学院
出处 《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2025年第6期109-119,共11页 Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“药品专利链接制度的垄断风险防控研究”(24CFXB057)。
关键词 大型数字平台 反垄断 公共利益 创新生态 Large digital platforms Anti-monopoly Public interest Innovation ecosystem
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献198

共引文献419

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部