摘要
违法行为后果分散化、社会化的利益冲突,不仅需要通过基于社会本位理念的实体法予以确权,更需要构建或完善基于该理念的程序法去高效解决群体性纠纷。构建多元化社会主体共同参与、以“有利的自动授权,不利的被动同意”为特色且代表人处分权能完备的民事公益诉讼机制,以及以“默示加入,明示退出”为特色和以维护实质正义为依归的民事公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿金范围确定、分配顺位、归属比例等制度,可进一步优化公共利益保护的事前预防和事后弥补机制,进而强化制度激励效能,增强社会创新发展动力,提升社会整体效率、效益;同时,还能提升民事公益诉讼的社会治理协同效能,切实维护社会公共利益。
The consequences of illegal activities,which are characterized by dispersed and socialized conflicts of interest,not only require the affirmation of rights through substantive law based on a social oriented philosophy,but also demand the construction or improvement of procedural law grounded in the same concept so as to resolve collective disputes efficiently.Establishing a civil public interest litigation mechanism featuring the participation of diverse social entities,characterized by“automatic authorization for favorable outcomes and passive consent for unfavorable ones”,with comprehensive representative disposition rights—alongside systems for determining the scope,distribution priority,and allocation ratios of punitive damages in civil public interest litigation-featured by“automatic authorization for favorable circumstances and passive consent for unfavorable ones”and guided by upholding substantive justice,which can further optimize the ex-ante prevention and ex-post compensation mechanisms for safeguarding public interests.This,in turn,strengthens institutional incentives,enhances the driving force for social innovation and development,and improves overall social efficiency and effectiveness.Moreover,it can boost collaborative governance efficacy of civil public interest litigation,thereby effectively safeguarding societal public interests.
作者
王建权
WANG Jianquan(College of Henan Procuratorial Profession Institute of Procuratorial Affairs,Zhengzhou,Henan 451191,China)
出处
《中州大学学报》
2025年第6期54-58,共5页
Journal of Zhongzhou University
基金
河南省哲学社会科学教育强省项目“河南高等教育强省建设法治保障研究”(2025JYQS0100)。
关键词
社会本位
民事公益诉讼
惩罚性赔偿
social orientation
civil public interest litigation
punitive damages
