期刊文献+

基于动态事件触发学习滑模的航天器编队构形维持控制

Dynamic Event-Triggered Spacecraft Formation Configuration Maintenance Control via a Learning Sliding Mode Approach
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对航天器编队通信受限和空间受摄下的构形维持控制问题,研究了一种基于学习切比雪夫神经网络(Chebyshev Neural Network,CNN)和动态事件触发(Dynamic Event Triggering,DET)机制的控制方法。为了补偿空间干扰的影响,研究了一种基于迭代学习算法的学习CNN模型,与传统CNN模型相比,该模型计算资源占用更少。然后,基于滑模控制理论和图论知识设计了一种终端滑模控制器。最后,为所提控制器设计了一种DET机制。仿真结果表明,所提出的控制方法能实现高精度的构形维持,并且有效减少编队集群间的通信频率超过92.01%,同时避免芝诺现象。 To address the issue of spacecraft formation maintenance under communication constraints and space disturbances,this paper investigates a control method based on the learning Chebyshev Neural Network(CNN)and a Dynamic Event Trigger(DET)mechanism.To compensate for the effects of space disturbances,a learning CNN model based on an iterative learning algorithm is proposed,which requires fewer computational resources compared to traditional CNN models.Subsequently,a terminal sliding mode controller is designed based on sliding mode control theory and graph theory.Finally,a DET mechanism is designed for the proposed controller.Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed control method achieves high-precision formation maintenance,effectively reduces inter-formation communication frequency by over 92.01%,and avoids the Zeno phenomenon.
作者 李庚欢 贾庆贤 宋婷 孙秀芹 LI Genghuan;JIA Qingxian;SONG Ting;SUN Xiuqin(College of Astronautics,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016;School of Astronautics,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710000;Shanghai Aerospace Control Technology Institute,Shanghai 201109;Shanghai Key Laboratory of Space Intelligent Control Technology,Shanghai 201109;Maanshan College,Maanshan 243100)
出处 《飞控与探测》 2025年第6期37-47,共11页 Flight Control & Detection
基金 微小型航天器快速设计与智能集群全国重点实验室基金(MS01240109) 南京航空航天大学科研与实践创新计划(xcxjh20241504)。
关键词 航天器编队 动态事件触发 神经网络 迭代学习算法 滑模控制 spacecraft formation dynamic event trigger neural network iterative learning algorithm sliding mode control
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1Leitner J A. Spacecraft formation flying-an overview of missions and technology challenges,AAS 07-031[R].Washington:AAS,2007.
  • 2DARPA. Appendix1 F6 Developer''''s[R].Arlington:DARPA,2010.
  • 3Andrews J. Constellation of distributed NanoSats for real time earth observation,IAA 2011 B8-1002[A].Berlin:IAA,2011.4-8.
  • 4Vaddi SS, Vadali SR, Alfriend KT. Formation flying: accommodating nonlinearity and eccentricity perturbations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(2): 214-223.
  • 5Gurfil P. Relative motion between elliptic orbits: generalized boundedness conditions and optimal formation-keeping. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2005, 28(4): 761-767.
  • 6Kasdin NJ, Gurfil P, Kolemen E. Canonical modeling of relative spacecraft motion via epicyclic orbital elements. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2005, 92(4): 337-370.
  • 7Schaub H, Alfriend KT. J2 Invariant relative orbits for spacecraft formations. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2001, 79(2): 77-95.
  • 8Xu M, Wang Y, Xu SJ. On the existence of J2 invariant relative orbits from the dynamical system point of view. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2012, 112(4): 427-444.
  • 9Damaren CJ. Almost periodic relative orbits under J2 perturbations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part G, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2007, 221(5): 767-774.
  • 10Guibout VM, Scheeres DJ. Spacecraft formation dynamics and design. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(1): 121-133.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部