期刊文献+

超真实的真实:元现代主义语境下街头艺术的实践策略与伦理困境

Hyperreal Authenticity:Practical Strategies and Ethical Dilemmas of Street Art in the Metamodernism Context
原文传递
导出
摘要 在智能媒介高度渗透的当代城市中,街头艺术的真实性在数字拟像与物理现实的交融中被重新定义。该文基于鲍德里亚的“超真实”理论与元现代主义框架,提出街头艺术正经历从后现代反叛向元现代建构的范式转型。围绕技术中介既赋能又消解真实性的核心张力,提炼出媒介混合性、时空重构性、情感振荡性及批判互动性的四维实践策略,以此阐释街头艺术如何在真实性悖论中重构一种新型的“超真实的真实”。进而,从本体认知、空间权利与算法中介三层面揭示其伦理困境。研究认为,元现代街头艺术的伦理核心不在于解决悖论,而在于富有创造力地与之共存。 In the contemporary city permeated by intelligent media,the authenticity of street art is being redefined through the fusion of digital simulacra and physical reality.Drawing on Baudrillard's theory of"hyperreality"and the metamodernism framework,this paper proposes that street art is undergoing a paradigm shift from postmodern rebellion to metamodern construction.Centering on the core tension of technological mediation simultaneously empowering and deconstructing authenticity,it distills a four-dimensional practical strategy comprising medial hybridity,spatiotemporal restructuring,emotional oscillation,and critical interactivity.This framework explains how street art reconstructs a novel form of"hyperreal authenticity"within the authenticity paradox.Furthermore,the study reveals the ensuing ethical dilemmas across three dimensions:ontological cognition,spatial rights,and algorithmic mediation.The research contends that the ethical core of metamodern street art lies not in resolving the paradox,but in creatively coexisting with it.
作者 黄瑾钰 郭润坤 HUANG Jinyu;GUO Runkun(Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou Guangdong,510521,China)
机构地区 广东金融学院
出处 《文化创新比较研究》 2025年第35期181-184,共4页 Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation
关键词 元现代主义 超真实的真实 街头艺术 实践策略 伦理困境 真实性悖论 Metamodernism Hyperreal authenticity Street art Practical strategies Ethical dilemmas Authenticity paradox
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1Linda Hutcheon, The Politics of Postmodernism, New York/ London : Routledge,2002, pp. 165 - 166.
  • 2Alan Kirby, Digimodernism : How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture, New York/Lon- don : Continuum ,2009, p. 1.
  • 3R. Samuels, "Auto - Modernity after Postmodernism : Autono- my and Automation in Culture,Technology,and Education", in Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, ed. T. Mcpherson, Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press ,2008, p. 219.
  • 4A. Searle,"The Richest and Most Generous Tate Triennial Yet" ,The Guardian, March 2,2009. http://www, guardian. co. uk/artanddesign/2OO9/feb/O2/alter - modern - tate - triennial.
  • 5R. Campbell - Johnston," Ahermodern : Tate Triennal 2009 at Tare Britain", The Times, March 2,2009, T'2,20,21.
  • 6N. Bourriaud, ed. Altermodern. Tate Triennal 2009, London : Tate Publishing,2009 ,p. 12.
  • 7C. Peters, Kant's Philosophy of Hope, New York : Peter Lang, 1993 ,p. 117.
  • 8I. Kant,"Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View" ,in Kant, On History, ed. L. White Beck, Up- per Saddle River : Prentice Hall ,2001, p. 11, p. 12.
  • 9E. Voegelin, "Equivalences of Experience and Symbolization in History",ed. E. Sandoz, vol. 12 of The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Baton Rouge : Louisiana State University Press, 1989,p. 119,p.20.
  • 10R. Avramenko, "Bedeviled by Boredom : A Voegelinian Read- ing of Dostoevsky's Possessed", Humanitas 17, nos. 1 & 2 (2004) ,p. 116.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部