摘要
文学史指瑕批评可看作古典文论指瑕批评话语的现代转化,其意在对文学史著的史实与史实基础上的史识作出批评。《哈佛新编中国现代文学史》中《浩然的自我批评》一文有较多史实不准与史识值得商榷之处,可用指瑕批评的方式逐一勘误与商榷,对部分不当之处进行必要阐述。该文的不当之处可以作为窥探《哈佛新编中国现代文学史》存在问题的一种视角,即王德威更在意的是文学史书写理论方法的创新,而不是文学史史实是否准确。它打开了文学史的视野,更新了文学史书写的观念,但疏于细密扎实地考证也容易出现史实上的不严谨。在文学史写作中,的确需要审慎的态度与扎实的考证。
Literary history criticism can be regarded as the modern transformation of the classical literary theory’s criticism of flaws.It aims to criticize the historical facts and the historical insights based on these facts in literary history works.The article“Hao Ran’s Self-Criticism”in A New Literary History of Modern China has many inaccurate historical facts and questionable historical insights.These can be corrected and discussed one by one through the method of criticism of flaws,and necessary explanations can be provided for some inappropriate parts.The inappropriate aspects of this article can be used as a perspective to explore the problems existing in A New Literary History of Modern China,that is,David Der-wei Wang pays more attention to the innovation of the theoretical methods of literary history writing rather than the accuracy of historical facts.It broadens the perspective of literary history and updates the concept of literary history writing,but the lack of meticulous and solid research can also lead to inaccuracy in historical facts.In the writing of literary history,a cautious attitude and solid research are indeed necessary.
出处
《华文文学》
2025年第6期19-24,共6页
Literatures in Chinese
关键词
指瑕
《浩然的自我批评》
《哈佛新编中国现代文学史》
浩然
文学史写作
Criticism of flaws
“Hao Ran’s Self-Criticism”
A New Literary History of Modern China
Hao Ran
literary history writing
