摘要
我国建立了由行政处罚、刑事责任及惩罚性赔偿组成的知识产权保护惩罚性规则体系。应否或如何适用知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度,应在该惩罚性规则体系中予以系统思考。核心问题为,相对于行政处罚或刑事责任,惩罚性赔偿到底具有何种规范价值。以历史与体系的视角看,惩罚性赔偿在知识产权保护惩罚性规则体系中应处于补充惩罚地位。同一违法行为同时满足公法责任与惩罚性赔偿责任的构成要件的,公法责任须强制实施的特性,相比惩罚性赔偿的私法自治性,使公法责任获得优先实施的法治地位。惩罚性赔偿的补充惩罚地位,主要体现在公法责任存在立法缺陷、规范局限或实施不力的情形。在法院、检察院及相关行政机关之间建立案件综合处理协调机制,是惩罚性赔偿发挥作用的基础性条件。
China has established a punitive rule system for intellectual property protection,comprising administrative penalties,criminal liability,and punitive damages.Whether and how to apply the punitive damages system for intellectual property rights should be systematically considered within the framework of such punitive rules.The core issue is to determine what normative value punitive damages hold in comparison to administrative penalties or criminal liability.From a historical and systemic perspective,punitive damages should occupy a supplementary punitive position in the punitive rule system of intellectual property protection.If the same illegal act satisfies both the elements of public law liability and punitive damages liability,the mandatory implementation of public law liability gives it a priority legal status compared to the private law autonomy of punitive damages.The supplementary punitive status of punitive damages is mainly reflected in situations where there are legislative deficiencies,normative limitations or ineffective implementation of public law liabilities.Establishing a comprehensive case handling and coordination mechanism among courts,procuratorates,and relevant administrative agencies is a fundamental condition for the effectiveness of punitive damages.
出处
《中国应用法学》
2025年第6期105-122,共18页
China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
基金
中国社会科学院学科建设“登峰战略”资助计划(DF2023YS32)的研究成果。
关键词
知识产权保护
惩罚性赔偿
惩罚性规则
行政处罚
刑事责任
intellectual property protection
punitive damage
punitive rule
administrative penalty
criminal liability
