期刊文献+

解肌提韧手法、生物刺激反馈仪联合腹直肌训练在产后腹直肌分离修复中的应用研究

Application of Muscle-Relaxing and Ligament-Lifting Manipulation,Bio-stimulation Feedback Device Combined with Rectus Abdominis Training in the Repair of Postpartum Diastasis Recti Abdominis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察解肌提韧手法、生物刺激反馈仪联合腹直肌训练在产后腹直肌分离修复中的应用效果。方法:选择2022年6月—2024年2月台州市妇幼保健院收治的70例产后腹直肌分离患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各35例。对照组剔除、脱落3例,观察组剔除、脱落4例。对照组予以生物刺激反馈仪联合腹直肌训练,观察组在对照组基础上加用解肌提韧手法。比较2组腹围恢复情况、腹直肌分离恢复情况、腹部筋膜疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、腹直肌间距(IRD)值。结果:治疗后,2组脐上围、脐围、脐下围较治疗前缩小(P<0.05);且观察组脐上围、脐围、脐下围小于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组的腹直肌分离恢复优于对照组(P<0.05)。2组治疗后的疼痛VAS评分随着治疗次数的增多逐渐降低(P<0.05);治疗3次、5次、10次后,观察组VAS评分均低于同期对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组脐上、脐环、脐下IRD值较治疗前减少(P<0.05),且观察组脐上、脐环、脐下IRD值小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:解肌提韧手法、生物刺激反馈仪联合腹直肌训练有利于促进产后腹直肌分离的恢复,改善产后腹围,减轻产妇腹部筋膜疼痛。 Objective:To observe the application effect of muscle-relaxing and ligament-lifting manipulation,bio-stimulation feedback device combined with rectus abdominis training in the repair of postpartum diastasis recti abdominis.Methods:A total of 70 patients with postpartum diastasis recti abdominis admitted to Taizhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital from June 2022 to February 2024 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group(n=35 per group)using a random number table method.Three cases were excluded or dropped out in the control group,and four cases were excluded or dropped out in the observation group.The control group received bio-stimulation feedback device combined with rectus abdominis training,while the observation group received muscle-relaxing and ligament-lifting manipulation in addition to the control group's regimen.The recovery of abdominal circumference,the recovery of diastasis recti abdominis,the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)score for abdominal fascial pain,and the inter-rectus distance(IRD)value were compared between the two groups.Results:After treatment,the upper umbilical circumference,umbilical circumference,and lower umbilical circumference decreased in both groups compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),and the observation group had smaller upper umbilical circumference,umbilical circumference,and lower umbilical circumference than the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the recovery of diastasis recti abdominis was better in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).The pain VAS scores in both groups gradually decreased with the increase of treatment times(P<0.05),and the VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group after 3,5,and 10 treatments(P<0.05).The IRD values at the upper umbilical,umbilical ring,and lower umbilical areas decreased in both groups compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),and the observation group had smaller IRD values than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Muscle-relaxing and ligament-lifting manipulation,bio-stimulation feedback device combined with rectus abdominis training is beneficial for promoting the recovery of postpartum diastasis recti abdominis,improving postpartum abdominal circumference,and alleviating abdominal fascial pain in parturients.
作者 刘水清清 陈海龙 李易蓉 安大伟 LIU Shuiqingqing;CHEN Hailong;LI Yirong;AN Dawei(Taizhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Taizhou Zhejiang 318000,China;Central Health Center of Youxi Town,Linhai City,Linhai Zhejiang 317025,China;Department of Medical Education,Linhai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Linhai Zhejiang 317000,China)
出处 《新中医》 2025年第23期80-84,共5页 New Chinese Medicine
基金 2023年度浙江省中医药科技计划项目(2023ZL779)。
关键词 产后腹直肌分离 解肌提韧手法 生物刺激反馈仪 腹直肌训练 修复效果 视觉模拟评分法 腹直肌间距 Postpartum diastasis recti abdominis Muscle-relaxing and ligament-lifting manipulation Bio-stimulation feedback device Rectus abdominis training Repair effect Visual Analogue Scale Inter-rectus distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献63

  • 1孙树椿,孙之镐.临床骨科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:1023.
  • 2Carlsson AM.Assessment of chronic pain.Aspects of the re- liability and validity of the visual analogue scale[J].Pain,1983,16(1):87-101.
  • 3Roland M,Fairbank J.The Roland - Morris disability ques- tionnaire and the oswestry disability questionnaire[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000,25(24):3115-3124.
  • 4Fairbank JC.Oswestry disability index [J].J Neurosurg Spine,2014,20(2):239-241.
  • 5Stanton TR,Latimer J,Maher CG,et al.A modified Delphi approach to standardize low back pain recurrence terminolo- gy [J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(5):744-752.
  • 6Young AE,Wasiak R,Gross DP.Recurrence of work - relat- ed low back pain and disability:association between self - report and workersIcompensation data [J].Spine ( Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(26):2279-2286.
  • 7Chandanwale AS,Chopra A,Goregaonkar A,et al.Evalua- tion of eperisone hydrochloride in the treatment of acute musculoskeletal spasm associated with low back pain:A randomized,double - blind,placebo - controlledtrial [J].J Postgrad Med,2011,57(4):278-285.
  • 8Bhattarai S,Chhetri HP,Alam K,et al.A study on factors affecting low back pain and safety and efficacy of NSAIDs in acute low back pain in a tertiary care hospital of Western Nepal[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2013,7(12):2752-2758.
  • 9Rossi M,Ianigro G,Liberatoscioli G,et al.Eperisone versus tizanidine for treatment of chronic low back pain [J].Miner- va Med,2012,103(3):143-149.
  • 10于淑丽,王燕翔,胡凤贤,张殿尧,苏凤龙.生物反馈联合电刺激手法按摩治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病临床研究[J].陕西中医,2011,32(6):741-742. 被引量:7

共引文献203

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部