期刊文献+

Effectiveness of Xu-Based Interventions in Foreign Language Learning:A Meta-Analysis

基于续论的外语学习干预效果:一项元分析研究
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study presents a systematic review of xu-based studies in an attempt to clarify the construct of the xu-argument and the effectiveness of continuation tasks in foreign language learning.This review adopted a meta-analytic procedure consisting of effect-size aggregation and moderator analysis.While the former quantitatively synthesized evidence in support of xu-based interventions,the latter contextualized evidence in relation to learner and task features.Meta-analytic results indicated a medium-to-large effect of xu-based interventions for foreign language learning(g=1.18 and g=0.49 for within-group and between-group contrasts respectively).This effect was comparatively larger for(a)university-level students,(b)multilingual settings,(c)foreign languages other than English(LOTEs),(d)longer instructional treatments,and(e)specific language features.We interpret supportive evidence for xu-based interventions with respect to theoretical,methodological and pedagogical relevance,and provide empirically grounded recommendations for future task design and research on xu-based practices. 本研究系统回顾了基于续论的外语学习相关文献,旨在厘清续论的概念内涵,揭示“续”任务在外语学习中的促学效果。研究采用元分析方法,结合效应量整合与调节变量分析:前者量化整合了支持以“续”促学教学干预的实证依据,后者则结合学习者特征与任务变量对研究结果进行情境化解读。结果显示,续论指导下的外语学习干预整体呈现中等至较大的效应量(组内对比g=1.18,组间对比g=0.49)。干预效果在以下情境下更为显著:学习者(a)为大学阶段学习者、(b)处于多语学习环境、(c)目标语为非英语类外语(LOTEs)、(d)干预持续时间较长,且(e)“续”任务聚焦于特定语言特征。研究从理论、方法与教学三个层面探讨了基于续论的外语学习干预的适切性,并提出了任务设计优化与后续研究建议。
作者 Hongying Peng Chuming Wang 彭红英;王初明(广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心)
出处 《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》 2025年第4期485-502,638,共19页 中国应用语言学(英文)
基金 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目资助(项目编号:GD24YWY02)。
关键词 the xu-argument continuation tasks ALIGNMENT META-ANALYSIS 续论 “续”任务 协同 元分析
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1王初明.论外语学习的语境[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(3):190-197. 被引量:240
  • 2DeKeyser, R. M. 2007. Practice in a Second Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Ellis, R. 1994. Implicit/explicit knowledge and language pedagogy [J]. TESOL Quarterly 28 (1) : 166-172.
  • 4Larsen-Freeman, D. 2006. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English [J].Applied Linguistics 27(4): 590- 619.
  • 5Laufer, B. & J. Hulstijn. 2001. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement [J]. Applied Linguistics 22( 1): 1-26.
  • 6Long, M. H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition [A]. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 413-468.
  • 7Luria, A. R. 1961, Study of the abnormal child [J]. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry: A Journal of Human Behavior 31 : 1-16.
  • 8Nation, I. S. P. 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary [M]. New York: Newbury House.
  • 9Pickering, M. J. & S. Garrod. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue [J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2) : 169-226.
  • 10Skeban, P. & P. Foster. 2001. Cognition and tasks [A]. In P. Robinson (ed.). Cognition and Second Language Instruction [C]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 183-205.

共引文献568

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部