摘要
“文艺中国化”讨论虽然是抗战时期发生的一场规模较小的理论争鸣,但是它与“文艺民族形式”讨论关系密切,展开相关研究对于认识“文艺民族形式”讨论的发生发展及其性质具有重要的参照价值。“文艺中国化”讨论与“文艺民族形式”讨论属于同一种性质的讨论,实际上可以归为同一场讨论。首先,两场讨论的立足点具有一致性;其次,两场讨论在“中国化”建设、“民族形式”建设路径的设计上具有高度的一致性;再次,两场讨论所使用的核心概念是相通的。由此可以得出如下结论:文艺民族形式讨论的口号原本是“文艺中国化”,也应该是“文艺中国化”,“文艺民族形式”只不过是讨论展开的过程中重新调整后的口号;“文艺民族形式”讨论正式发端的时间应该是1938年2月,而不是1939年2月。
The discussion on“Sinicization of literature and art”was a relatively small-scale theoretical debate during the Anti-Japanese War.However,it was closely related to the discussion on“national forms of literature and art”.Research in this regard holds a significant reference value for understanding the emergence,development and nature of the discussion on“national forms of literature and art”.The discussion on“Sinicization of literature and art”and the discussion on“national forms of literature and art”have the same nature and can essentially be classified as the same doctrine debate.Firstly,the two discussions share a common foundation;secondly,they exhibit a high degree of consistency in designing the paths for achieving“Sinicization”and“national forms”;thirdly,the core concepts used in both discussions are interconnected.The original slogan of the discussion on“national forms of literature and art”should have been“Sinicization of literature and art”,and it ought to have remained as such,with“national forms of literature and art”merely being an adjusted slogan in the course of the discussion;the formal inception time of the discussion on“national forms of literature and art”should be dated to February 1938,rather than February 1939.
作者
杜吉刚
DU Jigang(School of Humanities,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China)
出处
《鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2025年第5期80-86,共7页
Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“抗战时期文艺民族形式讨论与中国化讨论关联研究”(16BZW006)。
关键词
“文艺中国化”
“文艺民族形式”
马克思主义中国化
学术中国化
大众化
“Sinicization of literature and art”
“national form of literature and art”
Sinicization of Marxism
academic Sinicization
popularization
