摘要
基于“制度−文化”的耦合视角检索了2000—2024年中国知网(CNKI)与Web of Science核心数据库的中国乡村旅游发展研究文献,运用CiteSpace文献计量工具,梳理了中国乡村旅游发展研究演进过程,比较分析了中国乡村旅游发展在国内与国际不同语境下的研究阶段、热点主题及方法论方面的差异与共性。研究发现:①中、英文语境下该研究均呈现热度攀升趋势,但阶段特征分化明显:国内研究受政策驱动,围绕乡村振兴、文旅融合、共同富裕等议题形成实践导向型框架;而国际上更加关注可持续性、社区赋权与乡村绅士化等微观议题,主要体现批判性视角;②制度与文化的动态互构是乡村旅游发展的核心逻辑。国内中文语境下研究强调政策刚性对文化资本化的赋能作用,国际英文语境下研究则聚焦全球化背景下文化原真性与制度权力的博弈;③方法论存在显著差异。国内研究偏重政策验证与定量分析,聚焦乡村旅游产业发展;而在国际上研究则以质性解构为主,将更多视角投射到与乡村旅游相关的社区及人的探讨。未来乡村旅游研究应考虑从理论整合与框架创新、方法论创新、主题深化与拓展3个方面进行深入探讨。
Rural tourism serves as a vital instrument for China’s rural revitalization,playing a significant role in diversifying rural economies,promoting urban-rural integration,and achieving sustainable development.Based on the‘institutional-cultural’coupling perspective and utilizing the CiteSpace bibliometric tool,this study systematically reviewed the literatures on rural tourism development in China from the CNKI and Web of Science(WoS)core databases(2000—2024).It comparatively analyzed the differences and commonalities in research stages,hot topic,and methodologies between domestic(Chinese)and international(English)contexts.The findings reveal that:1)Research in both Chinese and English contexts shows rising popularity,yet with distinct stage characteristics.Domestic studies are policy-driven,forming a practice-oriented framework around rural revitalization,cultural-tourism integration,and common prosperity;international studies focus more on micro-level issues like sustainability,community empowerment,and rural gentrification,reflecting critical perspectives.2)The dynamic interplay between institutions and culture constitutes the core logic of rural tourism development.Domestic research emphasizes the enabling role of policy rigidity in cultural capitalization,while international research examines the contest between cultural authenticity and institutional power under globalization.3)There are significant methodological divergences:Domestic studies prioritize policy validation and quantitative analysis centered on industrial development,whereas international studies predominantly employ qualitative deconstruction,centering on communities and individuals.Key implications suggest that future research should deepen exploration in three critical dimensions:theoretical integration and framework innovation,methodological innovation,and thematic refinement and expansion.Particularly,there is a need for cross-disciplinary approaches that bridge the gap between policy implementation and community-based sustainable development models.Additionally,longitudinal studies tracking the socio-economic impacts of rural tourism could provide valuable insights for both academic and practical purposes.
作者
易鑫林
朱竑
侯欣宜
胡蕊纯
Yi Xinlin;Zhu Hong;Hou Xinyi;Hu Ruichun(School of Management Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China;School of Geography and Remote Sensing Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China;Center for Human Geography and Urban Development Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China)
出处
《地理科学》
北大核心
2025年第10期2129-2140,共12页
Geographical Science
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(42301257,42430515)
广东省科技厅项目(2021B1212050026)
宁夏重点研发项目(2023BEG02068)
广州大学全日制研究生“广州研究”项目(GZYJ2025007)资助。
关键词
乡村旅游
乡村振兴
主题分化
理论共性
“制度-文化”耦合视角
跨语境比较
rural tourism
rural revitalization
thematic differentiation
theoretical commonality
‘institution-culture’coupling perspective
cross-contextual comparison
