摘要
按照真、确证和信念的知识三要件的标准,生态学知识面临是否为确证的真信念的质疑。统计学方法产生了事实不等于确证的弊病;现代模态逻辑研究表明普拉特的强推理逻辑需要穷尽可能世界才能保真,但生态学家和自然处于“提问的问答模型”的博弈关系决定了真蕴含于包括谬误在内的可能世界中;知识及历史的与境约束导致知识建构,并引发了生态世界观的独有信念。据此,生态学知识是一种不保真却已形成特定信念的始终形成中的特定知识。
According to the traditional tripartite definition of knowledge—comprising truth,justification,and belief—ecological knowledge faces philosophical challenges regarding its status as justified true belief.Statistical methodologies often produce factual claims that lack robust justification;research in modern modal logic further reveals that Platt′s strong inference logic necessitates the exhaustive consideration of all possible worlds to ensure truth preservation.However,the interactive and game-theoretic relationship between ecologists and nature—situated within a"question-answer framework"—entails that truth resides within possible worlds that may include erroneous scenarios.Moreover,knowledge is shaped by historical and contextual constraints,leading to its constructed nature and fostering a distinctive ecological worldview.Thus,ecological knowledge represents a specific form of knowledge that is perpetually in formation:while it does not guarantee truth,it has formed its own specific beliefs.
出处
《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2025年第5期102-108,112,共8页
Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金规划项目(项目批准号:23BZX104)。
关键词
假说-演绎
溯因法
与境
Hypothetico-deductive
abduction
context
