期刊文献+

标准必要专利许可纠纷法律适用的基本模式研究——“市场—干预”混合模式之提倡 被引量:1

Research on the Basic Approach of Legal Application on Standard Essential Patent Licensing Disputes: Advocacyof the “Market-Intervention” Hybrid Approach
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球围绕应如何处理标准必要专利许可纠纷展开长期热议,并在近几年随着通信与信息技术、物联网技术发展而呈加强趋势。现时大致形成“市场模式”与“干预模式”两种主张:前者高度相信市场的力量,认为市场能自发形成行业习惯;后者相对不相信市场的力量,认为需要通过干预促使市场形成妥当实践。因标准必要专利许可中存在实施机会主义行为的风险,市场在调节创新活动时存在固有缺陷,仅采取“市场模式”不利于产业发展。而“干预模式”可能放大专利技术价值评价偏差,阻碍交易有效展开,不加限制地转向“干预模式”也不利于产业发展。为适当处理标准必要专利许可纠纷,应采取“市场—干预”混合模式,有所侧重地发挥市场或法律制度的作用。具体而言,构建混合模式应从如下四方面出发:谨慎而分情况适用停止侵权禁令,公允而有限度裁判许可使用费,有效追究缔约过失责任,谨慎追究反垄断责任。 There has been a longstanding debate on how to handle SEP(Standard Essential Patent)licensing disputes,and this discussion has intensified in recent years with the development of ICT(Information and Communication Technology)and IoT(Internet of Things).Currently,two main approaches have emerged:the“market approach”and the“intervention approach”.The former places great faith in the power of the market,believing that the market can spontaneously establish industry practices,while the latter expresses skepticism about the market's ability and advocates for intervention to ensure proper market practices.Due to the risk of opportunistic behavior in SEP licensing and inherent flaws in the market's ability to regulate innovation activities,relying solely on the“market approach”is not conducive to industrial development.While,the“intervention approach”might result in inaccuracies in evaluating the value of patent technology and impede efficient transactions,so a complete shift to the“intervention approach”is also not favorable for industrial development.In order to form an appropriate legal framework for handling SEP licensing disputes,a hybrid approach should be adopted and it is necessary to play the role of markets and legal institutions in different circumstances.Specifically,the construction of a“hybrid approach”should start from the following four aspects:cautiously and contextually applying injunctions,adjudicating SEP licensing fees in a proper and limited manner,holding parties liable for culpa in contrahendo effectively,and enforcing antitrust responsibilities cautiously.
作者 谭宇航 Tan Yuhang
出处 《南大法学》 2025年第5期153-173,共21页 NanJing University Law Journal
基金 司法部法治建设与法学理论课题“区块链技术赋能下的知识产权生态优化与治理策略研究”(编号22SFB5044)成果。
关键词 标准必要专利许可 法律治理 市场模式 干预模式 Standard Essential Patent Licensing Legal Governance Market Approach Intervention Approach
  • 相关文献

共引文献225

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部