期刊文献+

以激励促保护的耕地“大占补”制度优化进路——基于耕地发展权转移的国际比较与逻辑阐释 被引量:1

Optimizing the'compensation to comprehensive occupation'system for farmland conservation through incentive mechanisms:Based on the international comparison and logical interpretation of the transfer of farmland development right
原文传递
导出
摘要 “大占补”制度是坚守耕地保护红线的关键举措,探索激励措施是激发补充耕地主体耕作意愿及确保补充耕地稳定利用的应有之义。基于Williamson社会科学分析框架和情景分析法,旨在辨析国内外耕地发展权转移实践,阐释“大占补”制度在不同情景下耕地发展权转移的内在逻辑,提出相应优化策略。研究发现:(1)“大占补”制度本质上是基于耕地发展权转移的政策工具,其与国际上耕地发展权转移制度在制度环境、治理结构、资源配置方面同中存异;(2)当补充区发生耕地发展权“转移”或“还原”时,补充耕地主体应捕获“耕地发展权转移许可费用”或获偿“损失的耕地增值收益”;(3)应以耕地发展权转移价值捕获为进路,遵循“明确产权主体—创新治理结构—提高配置效率”的策略进一步优化“大占补”制度。研究结果为完善耕地保护政策,激励补充耕地主体提供了理论与实践参考。 The'compensation to comprehensive occupation'system(CCOS),which is characterized by rigid regulations,serves as a crucial policy for China to enforce the redline mandate for farmland conservation and reinforce the foundation of national food security.Exploring effective incentive measures is essential to stimulate the willingness of entities'responsibilities for compensating farmland and ensure its stable use.Based on Williamson's social science analytical framework and situational analysis methodology,this study aims to compare the practices of transfer of development right domestically and internationally,additionally,interpret its underlying logic in various scenarios,and propose an optimization system by capturing the value derived from the transfer of farmland development right(TFDR).The results show that:(1)Similar to the international TDR,the CCOS in China is a farmland conservation policy tool based on the TFDR.Their similarities and differences exist in institutional environment,governance structure,and resource allocation.(2)Under different scenarios within the CCOS,when farmland development rights are either transferred and realized in the occupied area or restored in the compensated area,the entities'responsibilities for compensated farmland should obtain the license fee for the TFDR or be compensated for revenue losses due to farmland appreciation,respectively.(3)Optimizing the CCOS should be guided by three key aspects.Firstly,the property rights subjects should be clearly defined to establish a property rights foundation for capturing and allocating value increments from the TFDR.Secondly,governance structure should aim to construct a hybrid governance framework integrating government supervision and market mechanism for the TFDR.Thirdly,allocation efficiency improvement requires the establishment of a system combining responsibility constraints and economic incentives for allocating the supplementary farmland.Optimizing the CCOS through the TFDR is an effective strategy to promote farmland conservation through economic incentives.The research findings offer theoretical and practical references for improving the farmland conservation policies and incentivizing the supplementary farmland providers.
作者 易路平 宋敏 张安录 YI Lu-ping;SONG Min;ZHANG An-lu(College of Public Administration,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China;School of Business Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处 《自然资源学报》 北大核心 2025年第9期2525-2540,共16页 Journal of Natural Resources
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(72374221)。
关键词 耕地“大占补”制度 耕地发展权转移 国际比较 逻辑阐释 经济激励 优化策略 farmland'compensation to comprehensive occupation'system transfer of farmland development rights international comparison logical interpretation economic incentives optimizing strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献352

同被引文献44

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部