期刊文献+

磁共振成像和经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室价值比较

Comparison of the Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Uterine Scar Diverticulum After Cesarean Section
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较磁共振成像(MRI)和经阴道彩色多普勒超声(TVUS)诊断剖宫产术后女性子宫瘢痕憩室(PCSD)的价值。方法选取医院2020年9月至2024年5月收治的疑似PCSD患者33例,分别经MRI和TVUS检查,比较超声图像及血流特点与磁共振的影像学表现。结果MRI的憩室深度、憩室长度均显著短于TVUS(P<0.05),相邻子宫肌层厚度显著厚于TVUS(P<0.05)。2种检查方法对PCSD解剖结构的评价有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论MRI在PCSD诊断中的准确率较TVUS高。 Objective To compare the value of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound(TVUS)in the diagnosis of uterine scar diverticulum(PCSD)after cesarean section.Methods A total of 33 suspected PCSD patients admitted to the hospital from September 2020 to May 2024 were selected and underwent MRI and TVUS examinations,respectively.The ultrasound images and blood flow characteristics were compared with the imaging findings of magnetic resonance imaging.Results The depth and length of the diverticulum detected by MRI were significantly shorter than those detected by TVUS(P<0.05),and the thickness of the adjacent uterine muscle layer was significantly thicker than those detected by TVUS(P<0.05).There was a significant difference in the evaluation of the anatomical structure of PCSD between the two examination methods(P<0.05).Conclusion MRI has a higher accuracy in the diagnosis of PCSD than TVUS.
作者 孙敏 卢姗 赵梦 崔亚楠 苗玉 程思佳 李明 SUN Min;LU Shan;ZHAO Meng;CUI Yanan;MIAO Yu;CHENG Sijia;LI Ming(Cangzhou Central Hospital,Cangzhou,Hebei,China 061000)
出处 《中国药业》 2025年第S1期122-124,共3页 China Pharmaceuticals
基金 河北省沧州市科技计划自筹经费项目[204106133]。
关键词 子宫瘢痕憩室 磁共振成像 经阴道彩色多普勒超声 诊断价值 uterine scar diverticulum Magnetic resonance imaging transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献101

  • 1汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:9
  • 2Davide L,Biscaldi E,Mistrangelo E,et al. MR1 appearanceof the low transverse incision after caesarean section in asymptomatic woman[J]. Eur J Radiol Extra,2006 ,59(3):133-136.
  • 3Wang CJ, Huang HJ,Chao A, et al. Challenges in thetransvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleedingsecondary to cesarean section scar defect^JJ. Eur J ObstetGynecol Reprod Biol,2011,154(2) :218-222.
  • 4Martins WP.Barra DA,Gallarreta FM, et al. Lower uter-ine segment thickness measurement in pregnant womenwith previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis usingtwo- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvagi-nal ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2009,33(3):301-306.
  • 5Stirnemann JJ,Chalouhi GE,Forner S,et al. First-trimes-ter uterine scar assessment by transvaginal ultrasound[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2011,205(6) :el-e6.
  • 6El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N,El'Khayat W,et al. Diagnos-tic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteros-copy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesareansection[J], Middle East Fertil Soc J ,2011,16( 1) :72-76.
  • 7Elizabeth AB, Jenny EM. Caesarean section: techniquesand complications [ J]. Obste Gynaecol Reprod Med,2011,21(4):97-102.
  • 8Pandit SN, Khan RJ. Surgical techniques for performingcaesarean section including CS at full dilatation[J]. BestPract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2013,27(2) : 179-195.
  • 9Horng HC,Wen KC,Su WH,et al. Review of myomecto-my[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2012,51(1) :7-11.
  • 10Chang CC, Chen W. A comparison of surgical outcomesbetween laparoscopic and open myomectomy in SouthernTaiwan[J], Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2012, 119 (2) : 189-193.

共引文献572

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部