期刊文献+

思想与表达二分法的理论研究

Theoretical Research on the Idea-Expression Dichotomy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 思想与表达二分法是著作权法的基本原则,旨在区分受保护的表达与不受保护的思想。本文从理论内涵、例外规则及司法实践三个维度展开研究。理论层面,梳理了思想与表达的定义及二分法的起源,指出思想属于公共领域,而表达则受法律保护。例外规则部分探讨了合并原则与情景原则,分析其在司法实践中的适用条件与限制。司法实践方面,结合我国指导案例81号,论证了必要场景和有限表达不受著作权保护的情形。研究表明,二分法在平衡创作者权益与社会公共利益中发挥关键作用,但其适用仍需结合个案具体分析。未来立法应进一步明确思想与表达的界限,以应对数字时代版权保护的新挑战。 The dichotomy of ideas and expressions is a fundamental principle of copyright law,aiming to dis-tinguish protected expressions from unprotected ideas.This article conducts research from three di-mensions:Theoretical connotation,exception rules and judicial practice.At the theoretical level,the definitions of thought and expression and the origin of dichotomy were sorted out.It was pointed out that thought belongs to the public domain,while expression is protected by law.The section on excep-tional rules explores the consolidation principle and the situational principle,and analyzes their ap-plication conditions and limitations in judicial practice.In terms of judicial practice,combined with guiding Case No.81 of our country,it has demonstrated the circumstances where necessary scenar-ios and limited expressions are not protected by copyright.Studies show that the dichotomy plays a key role in balancing the rights and interests of creators and the public interest of society,but its application still needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.Future legislation should further clar-ify the boundaries between thought and expression to address the new challenges of copyright pro-tection in the digital age.
作者 李岩 Yan Li(School of Law,Qingdao University,Qingdao Shandong)
机构地区 青岛大学法学院
出处 《争议解决》 2025年第8期51-56,共6页 Dispute Settlement
关键词 思想与表达二分 合并原则 情景原则 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Merger Doctrine Necessary Scenes Doctrine
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献43

  • 1李雨峰.为什么著作权法不保护思想[J].电子知识产权,2007(5):57-58. 被引量:12
  • 2Neil Gandal, Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for Network Externalities [J].25 RAND J. ECON. 160 (1994).
  • 3Kenneth W. Dam, Some Economic Considerations in the Intellectual Property Protection of Software [J] .24 J. LEGAL STUD. 321 (1995).
  • 4Glynn S. Lunney, Lotus v. Borland: Copyright and Computer Programs [ J ]. 70 TUL. L. REV. 2397 (1996).
  • 5Fred Anthony Rowley, Dynamic Copyright Law: Its Problenrs and a Possible Solution[J]. 11 Harv. J. Law & Tec(1998).
  • 6Peter S. Mennell, An Analysis of the Scope of Copyright Protection for Application Programs [ J ]. 41 STAN. L. REV. (1989).
  • 7Anthony L. Clapes, Software, Copyright and Competition: The Use of Antitrust Theory to Undercut Copyright Protection for Computers (sic) Programs, in INTEI,I,F, CTUAL PROPERTY ANTITRUST 1995 [ M ]. at 555 ( PLI Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Prop. Course Handbook Series No. G4-3942, 1995).
  • 8Herbert Rosenthal Jewely Coip. v. Kalpakian, 446 F.2d 738, 742 (9th Cir. 1971 ) .
  • 9Merritt Forbes & Co. v. Newnmn Inv. Secs., Inc., 604 F. Supp. 943,951 (S.D.N.Y. 1985).
  • 10Apple computer v. Franklin Computer 714 F.2d 1240, 1253 (3d Cir. 1983).

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部