期刊文献+

中外大学生学术写作微观句法复杂度对比

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究基于BAWE和TECCL语料库,对比分析中国和英国大学生学术写作微观句法复杂度。统计结果发现,在201项对比参数中,12项(6.0%)无显著差异,189项(94.0%)有显著差异,英国大学生写作的参数数值更高。差异原因可能包括教学规范、语料库设计、母语背景、学术规范及教学文化等。
出处 《英语广场》 2025年第22期59-63,共5页 English Square
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

  • 1吴继峰,陆小飞.不同颗粒度句法复杂度指标与写作质量关系对比研究[J].语言文字应用,2021(1):121-131. 被引量:26
  • 2陈慧媛,吴旭东.任务难度与任务条件对EFL写作的影响[J].现代外语,1998,21(2). 被引量:104
  • 3Bardovi-Harlig, K. & T. Bofman. 1989. Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11. 17-34.
  • 4Beers, S. & W. Nagy. 2007. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? OL]. http://www. springerlink, com/content/326811575526h8t8 /fulltext. pdf (accessed 05/03/2008).
  • 5Berman, R. & L. Verhoeven. 2002. Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing[J]. Written Language and Literacy 5: 1-43.
  • 6Crowhurst, M. 1980. Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels [J].Canadian Journal of Education 5. 6-13.
  • 7Crowhurst, M. 1983. Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review[J]. Canadian Journal of Education 8: 1-16.
  • 8Faigley, L. 1979. The influence of generative rhetoric on the syntactic maturity and writing effectiveness of college freshmen [J]. Research in the Teaching of English 13: 197-206.
  • 9Flahive, D. &B. Snow. 1980. Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions [A]. In J. Oiler & K. Perkins (eds.). Research in Language Testing[C]. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House. 171-176.
  • 10Homburg, T. 1984. Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? [J]. TESOL Quarterly 18: 87-107.

共引文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部