摘要
由于请求或被请求给付的主体发生变动,即使为或对第三人执行的给付请求权与执行名义确定的给付请求权在给付内容上具有同一性,也可以理解为存在两个不同的可以付诸执行的给付请求权。执行力扩张在表面上是未经生效法律文书载明的新给付请求权可以直接付诸执行,但实为法院为了保障旧给付请求权的执行利益而通过略式程序对显而易见或具有高度盖然性的新给付请求权作出新的执行名义。为了兼顾申请人的执行利益与被申请人的程序保障利益,对执行力扩张事由的限制不宜过分严苛。防止执行力扩张泛化的关键在于严格限制申请人证明新给付请求权具有高度盖然性的证据方法以及向被申请人提供事中适度的程序保障和事后充分的程序保障。
Due to changes concerning the party who requests or is obligated to perform,even if the claim rights to perform against or for a third person are substantially identical to those established by the original writ of execution,it is nonetheless appropriate to consider these as two distinct enforceable claim rights.In practice,courts often issue a new writ of execution for the claim rights that appearto be highly probable or manifestly clear,employing abbreviated procedures designed to uphold the enforcement interests embodied in the original writ.To balance the enforcement interests of the applicant with the procedural protection owed to the respondent,restrictions on the grounds for expanding enforceability should not be overly stringent.The primary safeguard against abuse of enforceability expansion lies in rigorously limiting the applicant's evidentiary method for demonstrating the high probability of the new claim right,while providing the respondent with appropriate procedural protection both during the process and upon completion.
出处
《比较法研究》
北大核心
2025年第4期135-151,共17页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
中国法学会2025年度部级法学研究课题“深化民事审判权和执行权分离改革研究”[项目编号:CLS(2025)C15]的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
执行名义
给付请求权
执行当事人适格
执行异议之诉
程序保障
writ of execution
claim right
qualification to apply for or be applied for enforcement
action against execution
procedural guarantee
