摘要
医学模拟评价已成为衡量医护人员临床能力的重要方法。这些评价为受评者提供了在还原真实医疗场景且受控的环境中展示临床技能的机会。然而,评价组织方必须采取特定的措施,才能保障这些评价能够产生有效且可靠的结果。模拟评价的信度是模拟评价质量保障的重要组成部分。本文从评价者、模拟环境和评价工具3个关键维度梳理了提升模拟评价信度的12项实用建议:①选择具备相关专业背景和丰富模拟教学与评价经验的评价者;②为评价者提供关于评价的规范化培训;③进行模拟评分和试点评价,以达成评价者之间的共识;④防止评价者超时工作或认知负荷超载;⑤为标准化人员提供充分的培训和再培训;⑥对标准化病人的角色演绎提供即时和长期的质量保障措施;⑦确保模拟器保持一致的运行状态;⑧确保模拟为受评者提供足够的功能仿真度;⑨明确定义评价工具中的要素和项目,并控制评价条目的数量;⑩如果使用多个评价工具,确保不同工具之间的一致性;(11)尽可能使用具有构念效度证据的评价工具;(12)建立确保数据(评分)采集一致性的系统,并确保数据安全。这些策略旨在帮助医学教育工作者构建结构化的、可信的模拟考核评价方案。
Medical simulation-based assessments have emerged as a vital method for evaluating the clinical competence of healthcare professionals.These assessments provide examinees with opportunities to practice clinical skills in a controlled environment that mirrors real-life medical scenarios.However,assessment organizers must implement specific measures to ensure that these assessments yield valid and reliable results.The reliability of simulation-based assessments is a crucial component of quality assurance.This article delineates twelve practical recommendations to enhance the reliability of medical simulationbased assessments across the three key dimensions of raters,simulation environment,and assessment tools.These recommendations include①selecting raters with relevant professional backgrounds and extensive experience in simulation-based teaching and assessment;②providing raters with standardized training for the assessment;③conducting mock ratings and piloting to reach consensus among raters;④preventing excessive work hours or cognitively overload while rating;⑤providing standardized personnel with adequate training and re-training;⑥implementing immediate and long-term quality assurance measures for standardized patient role performance;⑦maintaining consistent operation of simulation equipment;⑧guaranteeing the simulation provides adequate functional fidelity for the examinees;⑨clearly defining each element and item in assessment tools while controlling their quantity;⑩ensuring consistency when multiple assessment tools are used;(11)using assessment tools with evidence of construct validity when possible;and(12)establishing systems to ensure consistency in data(scoring)collection while safeguarding data security.These strategies aim to assist medical educators in developing structured and reliable simulation-based assessment schemes.
作者
李力
刘继海
谢亚典
史迪
胡小芸
陈志桥
安海燕
Li Li;Liu Jihai;Xie Yadian;Shi Di;Hu Xiaoyun;Chen Zhiqiao;An Haiyan(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University/Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Critical Care Medicine,Wuhan 430071,China;Department of Emergency Medicine,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases,Beijing 100730,China;Teaching Office,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China;Medical Intensive Care Unit,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China;Emergency Center,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China;Department of Anesthesiology,Peking University People's Hospital,Beijing 100044,China)
出处
《中华医学教育探索杂志》
2025年第7期865-871,共7页
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金
湖北省卫生健康委员会科研基金资助(HBJG-250007)。
关键词
模拟医学
评价
信度
质量控制
Medical simulation
Assessment
Reliability
Quality control
