期刊文献+

全球碳交易体系与欧盟碳边境调节机制 被引量:2

Global carbon trading system and EU carbon border adjustment mechanism
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了碳定价机制与碳市场发展,聚焦欧盟碳边境调节机制(CBAM)对中国的影响。通过梳理碳交易体系的理论来源及全球实践,分析欧盟CBAM的立法背景、核心规则与实施路径。通过分析提出以下观点:CBAM将推高中企对欧出口成本,加剧数据管理压力,并可能引发产业链低碳化重构;建议企业强化碳排放管理、推进绿色技术升级,并借力国家政策与国际合作,缩小碳价差距,提升国际竞争力。 Carbon pricing mechanisms and the development of carbon markets are dicussed,focusing on the impact of the EU′s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM)on China.By reviewing the theoretical origins and global practices of carbon trading systems,the legislative background,core rules,and implementation pathways of the EU's CBAM are analysed.Through analysis,the following viewpoints are proposed:CBAM will increase the export costs for Chinese enterprises to the EU,intensify data management pressures,and potentially trigger a low-carbon restructuring of industrial chains.Recommendations include strengthening carbon emission management,advancing green technology upgrades,and leveraging national policies and international cooperation to narrow the carbon price gap and enhance international competitiveness.
作者 杨文婕 杜志向 阿阳 吕粤 陈艳莹 YANG Wenjie;DU Zhixiang;A Yang;LYU Yue;CHEN Yanying(Intertek Testing Services Shanghai Ltd.,Shanghai 200233,China;Intertek Testing Services Shenzhen Ltd.,GDD Branch,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510730,China)
出处 《印染》 北大核心 2025年第8期89-94,共6页 China Dyeing and Finishing
关键词 碳市场 履约 欧盟碳边境调节机制(CBAM) 碳关税 carbon market compliance EU carbon border adjustment mechanism(CBAM) carbon tariff
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献99

  • 1Rogge, K. and V. Hoffmann (2009): "The Impact of the EU ETS on the Sectoral Innovation System for Power Generation Technologies: Findings for Germany", http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/28521/1/61067661X.pdf.
  • 2Rotfug, W.(2009): "Intraday Price Formation and Volatility in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: An Introductory Analysis", ZEW-Ccntre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, No. 09-018.
  • 3Rubin, J. (1996): "A Model of Intertemporal Emission Trading, Banking, and Borrowing", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31,269-286.
  • 4Sartzetakis, E. (1997): "Tradeable Emission Permits Regulations in the Presence of Imperfectly Competitive Product Markets: Welfare Implications," Environmental and Resource Economics, 9, 65-81.
  • 5Aldy, J., A.Krupnick, R.Newell, I.Parry, and W.Pizer,(2009): "Designing Climate Mitigation Policy", Rescourece for the Future, Discussion Paper, 08-16.
  • 6Alexeeva-Talebi, V. and N. Anger (2007):"Developing Supra-European Emissions Trading Schemes: An Efficiency and International Trade Analysis", ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 07-038.
  • 7Anger, N. and U. Obemdorfer (2008):"Firm Performance and Employment in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: An Empirical Assessment for Germany", Energy Policy, 36, 12-22.
  • 8Baumol, W. and W. Oates (1971): "The Use of Standard and Pricing for the Protection of the Environment", Swedish Journal of Economics, 73, 42-54.
  • 9Benz, E. and S. Truck (2009): "Modeling the Price Dynamics of CO2 Emission Allowances", Energy Economics, 31, 4-15.
  • 10Boehringcr, C., H. Koschel and U. Moslener,(2008): "Efficiency Losses from Overlapping Regulation of EU Carbon Emissions", Journal of Regulatory Economics, 33, 299-317.

共引文献129

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部