摘要
在全球化境遇中,建构中华民族文化主体性始终面临着三重考验:差异与同一的张力、自我与他者的对立、传统与现代的鸿沟。应对这三重考验不能依靠孤立实践,而需从本体论、认识论与方法论三个哲学维度展开系统性的回应。其一,在本体论维度上,应超越“文化本质主义”与“文化虚无主义”的两极思维,重构文化存在的张力结构,在差异与同一的动态关系中寻找融合之道,进而建构多元共生、互鉴互通的文明格局。其二,在认识论维度上,应突破“主体孤立性”与“他者绝对化”的对立结构,重申文化认同的生成性与交互性,通过主体性与主体间性的双向建构路径,确立中华文化在全球语境中的内在价值与自主地位。其三,在方法论维度上,应拒绝传统的僵化守成与现代性的全盘替代,通过创造性转化与创新性发展,将中华文化的历史智慧嵌入当代实践逻辑,推动传统与现代之间的有效衔接与动态融合。三条进路的辩证统一,不仅在认识论层面有力回应了西方“历史终结论”的形而上学设定,也在实践层面为超越“文明冲突论”的二元对抗模式提供了中国方案,最终指向中华民族文化主体性在“栖居-对话-创造”的循环中持续演进的新范式:在差异中建立连接,在对话中保持独特性,在转化中延续生命力。
In the context of globalization,the construction of Chinese national cultural subjectivity faces three enduring challenges:the tension between difference and identity,the opposition between the self and the Other,and the divide between tradition and modernity.Addressing these challenges requires not isolated responses,but systematic engagement across the philosophical dimensions of ontology,epistemology,and methodology.First,on the ontological level,it is essential to move beyond binary thinking such as“cultural essentialism”versus“cultural nihilism”,and to reconstruct the tension structure of cultural existence by seeking a path of integration within the dynamic relationship between difference and identity.This lays the groundwork for a pluralistic,symbiotic,and mutually enlightening civilizational pattern.Second,at the epistemological level,one must transcend the opposition between isolated subjectivity and the absolutization of the Other,reaffirming the generative and interactive nature of cultural identity.This involves a dual construction of subjectivity and intersubjectivity to establish the intrinsic value and autonomous position of Chinese culture within global discourse.Third,methodologically,it is necessary to reject both rigid traditionalism and wholesale modernist substitution.Through creative transformation and innovative development,the historical wisdom of Chinese culture can be embedded into contemporary practical logic,thus fostering dynamic integration between tradition and modernity.The dialectical unity of these three paths not only offers a powerful epistemological rebuttal to the Western metaphysical notion of the“end of history”,but also provides a Chinese solution to the antagonistic logic of the“clash of civilizations”.Ultimately,this points to a new paradigm for the continuous evolution of cultural subjectivity in the cycle of dwelling,dialogue,and creation-establishing connection through difference,maintaining distinctiveness through dialogue,and renewing vitality through transformation.
作者
陈平
CHEN Ping(School of Marxism,Northwest University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710127,China)
出处
《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2025年第4期26-34,共9页
Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
全球化
中华民族文化主体性
文明对话
三维辩证路径
传统与现代转化
globalization
Chinese national cultural subjectivity
civilizational dialogue
three-dimensional dialectical path
transformation of tradition and modernity
