期刊文献+

“二程”理学视域下的儒家法哲学研究

A Study on Confucian Legal Philosophy from the Perspective of Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi’s Neo-Confucianism
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 程颢、程颐作为宋明理学的奠基者,在北宋法律体系稳定而成熟的背景下,构建了一套完整的理学法哲学体系。在理论层面,“二程”以“天理”为哲学的最高范畴,赋予法以理论根源,即“法自理出”;同时融贯“变易”之道,保证法的动态性与稳定性。在实践层面,“二程”在人性论基础上讨论德刑关系,讲求在制刑、用刑中遵循人之“气禀”;将“执中”贯通于法刑的制定与执行,强调法治与伦理的平衡。在礼法合一层面,“二程”淡化了儒家传统中的法律工具主义色彩,追求以规范引导主体,实现道德自觉同天道秩序相合,具有深刻的内在超越性意义。 As the founders of Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism,Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi developed a comprehensive legal-philosophical system within Neo-Confucianism against the backdrop of a stable and mature legal framework in the Northern Song dynasty.This system can be interpreted through the following dimensions:on the theoretical level,Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi elevated natural law as the supreme philosophical category.This concept provided law with a metaphysical foundation,that is law arising from reason.Additionally,they integrated“change”to ensure the dynamic adaptability and stability of legal norms.On the practical level,based on their theory of human nature,the Cheng brothers discussed the relationship between virtue and punishment,advocating that the formulation and application of punishments should align with the“temperament”of people.They emphasized“upholding the principle and being unfair”in both the creation and enforcement of laws,aiming to balance the rule of law with ethical considerations.On the level of the unity of rites and laws,Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi shifted away from the instrumentalist view of law within Confucian tradition.Instead,they pursued a normative framework that guides individuals to harmonize their moral consciousness with the way of Heaven.This approach carries profound significance in terms of immanent transcendence.
作者 欧阳祯人 梅子泓 Ouyang Zhenren;Mei Zihong
出处 《中原文化研究》 2025年第4期52-59,共8页 The Central Plains Culture Research
基金 国家社会科学基金冷门绝学专项学术团队项目“钱绪山学派、龙溪学派与近溪学派文献整理及思想研究”(22VJXT001)。
关键词 “二程”理学 天理 法理 内在超越性 法哲学 Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi’s Neo-Confucianism natural law legal principle immanent transcendence philosophy of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1何忠礼.科举制度与宋代文化[J].历史研究,1990(5):119-135. 被引量:49
  • 2黄正建.唐代“士大夫”的特色及其变化——以两《唐书》用词为中心[J].中国史研究,2005(3):119-124. 被引量:14
  • 3Aristotle: "Categories", 2b15, The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, 1941, p. 10.
  • 4Suarez, On lndividuation, Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and Its Principle, Translated by J. J. E. Gracia , Marquette University Press, Wisconsin, 1982, p. 31.
  • 5Heidegger, The Fundamental Concept of Metaphysics, Indiana University Press, 1995, p. 51.
  • 6P. E. Strawson, Individuals -A Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen & Co. LTD, 1959, p. 104.
  • 7P. E. Strawson, Individuals-A Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen,& Co. LTD, 1959, p. 39.
  • 8Leibniz, "Discourse on Metaphysics", Leibniz Selections, Charies Scribner's Sons, New York. 1951, pp. 300 -301.
  • 9B. Bosanquet, The Principle of Individuality and Value, Macmilian and Co. , London, 1912, p. 40.
  • 10B. Bosanquet, The Principle of Individuality and Value, Macmilian and Co. , London, 1912, pp. 68 -72.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部