摘要
亚里士多德思想在中世纪的重新发现,引发了一场主教、神学家与哲学家之间关于“智慧”这一主题的激烈论辩。这场论辩不仅关涉神学与哲学思想上的碰撞,并且与基督教教会制度性的外部干预息息相关。为了厘清这一论辩的复杂情况,本文围绕“智慧”的概念,讨论了包括艾蒂安·唐皮耶和达契亚的波埃修、托马斯·阿奎那、根特的亨利和埃克哈特在内的四个案例。通过对他们观点之间的差异的比较、各自对亚里士多德和奥古斯丁观点的继承与改造的分析,以及对在当时历史背景下教会和大学等机构状况的考虑,这场中世纪的论辩被认为是在权力机构与理论过程的互动中得到塑造的动态的、复杂的、长期的过程。
The rediscovery of Aristotle's ideas in the Middle Ages sparked a heated debate among bishops,theologians,and philosophers on the subject of“wisdom.”This debate not only involves the collision of theological and philosophical ideas,but is also closely related to the external institutional intervention of the Christian church.In order to clarify the complexities of this debate,Speer discusses the concept of“wisdom”and Four related cases,including Etienne Tempier and Boethius of Dacia,Thomas Aquinas,Henry of Ghent and Eckhart.Through a comparison of the differences between their views,an analysis of their respective inheritance and transformation of Aristotle's and Augustine's views,and a consideration of the status of institutions such as churches and universities as historical context,this medieval debate is considered to be a dynamic,complex and long⁃term process that is shaped by the interaction between authority and theoretical processes.
出处
《伦理学术》
2024年第2期111-122,共12页
Academia Ethica
