期刊文献+

基于渥太华决策支持框架的危重症病人初级安宁疗护咨询方案的构建 被引量:1

Development of primary palliative care consultation program for critically ill patients based on the Ottawa decision support framework
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:基于渥太华决策支持框架(ODSF)构建危重症病人初级安宁疗护咨询方案。方法:以ODSF为理论指导,基于文献回顾和前期调查结果,构建危重症病人初级安宁疗护咨询方案初稿。通过2轮专家咨询形成危重症病人初级安宁疗护咨询方案终稿。结果:第1轮专家咨询问卷回收率为100.0%,专家意见提出率为57.1%;第2轮专家咨询问卷回收率为92.9%,专家意见提出率为15.4%;2轮专家咨询专家权威系数分别为0.905和0.898;第2轮专家咨询条目重要性评分的变异系数为0.00~0.17,肯德尔和谐系数为0.149(P=0.001);可行性评分的变异系数为0.00~0.19,肯德尔和谐系数为0.220(P<0.001)。最终形成包括3个一级条目、9个二级条目、24个三级条目的危重症病人初级安宁疗护咨询内容框架及危重症病人初级安宁疗护咨询流程。结论:危重症病人初级安宁疗护咨询方案具有科学性、可靠性、实用性及可行性,其咨询过程逐层推进,咨询结果有据可循,可为危重症救治与安宁疗护的整合提供参考。 Objective:To develop primary palliative care consultation program for critically ill patients based on the Ottawa decision support framework(ODSF).Methods:The draft of primary palliative care consultation program for critically ill patients was constructed under the guidance of ODSF theory,based on literature reviews and preliminary survey results.The final version of primary palliative care consultation program for critically ill patients was developed through 2 rounds of expert consultations.Results:Questionnaire recovery rate in the first round of expert consultations was 100.0%,with 57.1%of experts providing feedback.Questionnaire recovery rate in the second round of expert consultations was 92.9%,with 15.4%of experts providing feedback.The expert authority coefficients for the 2 rounds were 0.905 and 0.898,respectively.In the second round,the coefficient of variation for item importance scores ranged from 0.00 to 0.17,and the Kendall's W was 0.149(P=0.001).The coefficient of variation for feasibility scores ranged from 0.00 to 0.19,and the Kendall's W was 0.220(P<0.001).Finally,framework for primary palliative care consultation program for critically ill patients included 3 first⁃level items,9 second⁃level items,and 24 third⁃level items was formed,along with flow for primary palliative care consultation program for critically ill patients.Conclusions:The primary palliative care consultation program for critically ill patients was scientific,reliable,practical,and feasible.Its consultation process was progressive,and the outcome was evidence⁃based.It could provide reference for integrating critical care and palliative care.
作者 邓存清 郝燕萍 黄宇飞 林海洋 张军杰 彭美芳 DENG Cunqing;HAO Yanping;HUANG Yufei;LIN Haiyang;ZHANG Junjie;PENG Meifang(School of Nursing,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangdong 511436 China;Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2025年第14期2461-2466,共6页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 渥太华决策支持框架 危重症 安宁疗护 专家咨询 Ottawa decision support framework critical illness palliative care expert consultation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献93

  • 1李梦婷,陈朔晖,陈晓飞.新生儿重症监护室安宁疗护的研究进展[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2021(2):156-161. 被引量:11
  • 2马莉,王志稳,葛宝兰,马青变,葛洪霞,杜兰芳,路颖.急诊科危重患者院内转运前核查单的编制及应用[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2020,1(1):37-44. 被引量:9
  • 3Jun Qiu,Xiao-Li Wu,Zheng-Hui Xiao,Xian Hu,Xue-Li Quan,Yi-Min Zhu.Investigation of the status of interhospital transport of critically ill pediatric patients[J].World Journal of Pediatrics,2015(1):67-73. 被引量:7
  • 4Adhikari N K, Fowler R A, Bhagwanjee S, et al.Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults[J]. Lancet, 2010,376 (9749):1339-1346.
  • 5Angus D C, Barnato A E, Linde-Zwirble W T, et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epiderniologic study[J].Crit Care Med, 2004,32 (3) : 638-643.
  • 6The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients.The study to understand prognoses and preferences for out- comes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT)[J].JAMA, 1995,274(20) : 1591-1598.
  • 7Cook D, Rocker G. Dying with dignity in the intensive care unit[J].N Engl J Meal,2014,:370(26) ,2506-2514.
  • 8Lanken P N,Terry P B,Delisser H M,et al. An official American thoracic society clinical policy statement:Palli- ative care for patients with respiratoi'y diseases and criti- cal illnesses[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2008,177 (8):912-927.
  • 9Scheunemann L P,Arnold R M,White D B.The facilita- ted values history: Helping surrogates make authentic decisions for incapacitated patients with advanced illness [J].Am J Respir Crit Care Meal,2012,186(6) :480-486.
  • 10Drazen J M. Decisions at the end of life [J].N Engl J Med,2003,349(12) : 1109-1110.

共引文献92

同被引文献30

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部