期刊文献+

技术何以赋能人文社会科学研究新范式:以科技考古为例 被引量:1

How does technology empower new paradigms in humanities and social science:a case study of archaeological science
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以科技考古为案例,探讨技术赋能人文社会科学研究范式转型的逻辑路径。科技考古的建制化历经萌芽、奠基、体系化、成熟4个阶段,从早期单点技术引入逐步发展为多技术融合的学科范式,最终通过二级学科建制确立学术合法性。研究揭示:技术赋能呈现纵向阶段演进与横向要素互构的双重逻辑,即纵向形成工具突破、制度响应、生态重构的三阶递进,技术从辅助工具转化为驱动学科生态变革的核心要素;横向通过实证精度提升、研究领域拓展、规则体系建构三维互构,推动学科从经验研究转向标准化、交叉化与制度化的现代范式。科技考古的实践表明,技术赋能的本质是技术理性与学科建制的深度互构,其“人为催化式”建构路径为数字人文等领域提供可参考的范式创新模型,探索人文社会科学研究通过技术逻辑重构研究合法性、拓展知识生产边界的转型可能。 This study examines the logical pathways through which technology drives paradigm transformation in humanities and social sciences,using archaeological science as an empirical case.The institutionalization of archaeological science has progressed through four developmental phases:emergence,consolidation,systematization,and maturation.This evolution transitioned from initial adoption of isolated techniques to an integrated disciplinary paradigm combining multiple technologies,culminating in its formal establishment as a sub-discipline that secured academic legitimacy.Our analysis reveals a dual logic underpinning technological empowerment:1)Longitudinal progression through technological breakthroughs,institutional adaptation,and ecosystem restructuring,wherein technology evolves from an auxiliary tool to a core driver transforming disciplinary ecosystems.2)Horizontal interlocking of three dimensions:enhanced empirical precision,expanded research domains,and constructed regulatory frameworks.This synergy facilitates a shift from experience-based inquiry toward standardized,interdisciplinary,and institutionalized modern paradigms.Archaeological science demonstrates that technological empowerment fundamentally constitutes deep co-evolution between technical rationality and disciplinary institutionalization.Its model of"deliberate institutional catalysis"provides a replicable paradigm innovation framework for fields such as digital humanities.This exploration highlights the transformative potential for humanities and social sciences to leverage technological logic in reconstructing research legitimacy and expanding the frontiers of knowledge production.
作者 吴伟 李佳伲 陈艾华 WU Wei;LI Jiani;CHEN Aihua(School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;School of Law and Humanities,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处 《中国软科学》 北大核心 2025年第6期52-63,共12页 China Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目“重大创新需求牵引学科创新生态系统:演化与治理研究”(72274172) 国家自然科学基金委专项项目“交叉科学研究催生新领域新学科形成的机制及支持政策研究”(L2424122) 浙江省软科学研究重大项目“统筹推进教育科技人才体制机制一体改革重大问题研究”(2025C15009) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“高校交叉学科的形成机制与发展模式研究”(21YJA880059)。
关键词 技术赋能 人文社科 科技考古 学科建制 范式理论 technological empowerment humanities and social sciences archaeological science disciplinary institutionalization paradigm theory
  • 相关文献

共引文献2151

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部