摘要
宪法教义学强调宪法学研究中独立方法论和理论体系的重要性,对于提升宪法学的学术价值与学科地位功不可没,并逐渐在我国宪法学研究中占据主导地位。然而,宪法教义学存在理论与实践的双重缺陷。在理论上,宪法教义学不具有普适性,它既与我国法制传统与理论主流不符,也因其“以规范为中心”的学术诉求而不能还原中国宪法与宪制的真相。在实践中,鉴于我国宪制中的部分实质内容并不体现在宪法规范中,宪法教义学对规范的执着探求既不能反映我国宪制的全貌,也难以促进宪法的发展。由于我国不存在司法性质的合宪性审查,以司法为中心的宪法教义学在我国的适用空间相当有限。较之有成熟司法实践的其他部门法教义学而言,宪法教义学虽有可取之处,但不应当成为我国宪法学研究的主流范式。
Dogmatics of constitution emphasizes the importance of independent methodology and theoretical system in constitutional research,and has played an indispensable role in shaping the academic value and status of constitutional law,gradually occupying a dominant position in constitutional research in China.However,dogmatics of constitution has a dual deficiency in both theory and practice.In theory,dogmatics of constitution does not have universality,which is not in line with China's legal tradition and theoretical mainstream,and cannot restore the truth of China's constitution and constitutional system due to its academic demand of"norms as the center".In practice,given that some substantive contents of China's constitution are not reflected in constitutional norms,the adherence of dogmatics of constitution to norms cannot reflect the overall picture of China's constitution,nor can it promote its development.Due to the lack of judicial constitutional review in China,the applicability of dogmatics of constitution centered on the judiciary is quite limited.Compared to other departments of dogmatics of laws with mature judicial practice,although dogmatics of constitution is important,it should not become the mainstream paradigm of constitutional research in China.
出处
《法学》
北大核心
2025年第5期52-69,共18页
Law Science
基金
教育部重大课题攻关项目《全过程人民民主的法治保障体系建设研究》(项目批准号:22JZD017)的阶段性成果。
关键词
研究范式
宪法教义学
宪法学方法论
社科宪法学
mainstream paradigm
dogmatics of constitution
methodology of constitutional law
constitutional science based on social science
