摘要
技术革新和社会发展对专利保护要求增加。仲裁作为解决民商事纠纷的重要手段,在国内及国际上都日益受到青睐,但仲裁能否解决专利效力争议在学界和业界仍无定论,其在我国的适用面临现行法和理论的双重障碍。复合型专利纠纷的专利效力仲裁既有现实必要性,也具有理论上的正当性。仲裁的相对性可以化解专利效力仲裁与公共政策的冲突。我国可以从专利效力仲裁的申请人资格、可仲裁的专利、专利效力仲裁的相对性、与行政程序协调等角度,建构专利效力仲裁的制度并对现行法做相应修改。
Technological innovation and social development increase the requirements for patent protection.Arbitration as an important means of resolving civil and commercial disputes,both domestically and internationally are increasingly favored,but whether arbitration can resolve patent-validity disputes is still inconclusive in the academic and judicial practice,and its application in China is faced with the double obstacles of the existing law and theory.Arbitration on patent validity of composite patent disputes has both practical necessity and theoretical legitimacy.The relativity of arbitral awards can resolve the conflict between patent-validity arbitration and public policy.To construct a harmonious patent-validity arbitral system,Chinese legislation can make corresponding modifications to the existing law among the aspects of the applicant qualification,arbitrable patents,arbitral enforcement with the relative nature,and coordination with administrative procedures.
作者
张韬略
陈子怡
Zhang Taolüe;Chen Ziyi
出处
《电子知识产权》
2025年第4期4-16,共13页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
专利效力争议
可仲裁性
制度构建
公共政策
多元纠纷解决机制
Patent-Validity Disputes
Arbitrability
Institutional Construction
Public Policy
Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
