期刊文献+

无形经济本质探究及其于经济正义的双刃剑意义——基于《资本论》资本逻辑批判的当代解读

Inquiry into the Essence of the Intangible Economy and Its Double-Edged Sword Significance for Economic Justice——A Contemporary Interpretation Based on the Critique of Capital Logic in “Das Kapital”
原文传递
导出
摘要 在后工业时代转型中,以无形投资与文化生产为主的无形经济的崛起,使人类社会经济形态尤其是资本主义生产形态发生了领域、组织形态等历史性的变革,在《资本论》政治经济学批判之资本逻辑批判思想的当代视域中,在少数发达资本主义国家主导的依然尚处于资本主义经济时代的经济全球化的现实政治经济秩序中,仅仅是资本逻辑当代运作的结果和体现,资本逻辑的二律背反本质,必然使其对全球人民尤其包括中国在内的发展中国家人民的经济正义的实现,具有积极和消极的双重意义。这启示中国式现代化,必须以无形经济的社会主义运用为鲜明特征,本质上是以人民逻辑取代资本逻辑,以大力发展无形经济为根本战略和重要路径,来全面实现中国人民以共同富裕为内核的社会主义经济正义。上述探究,对“以新时代发展推进马克思劳动价值论的当代研究”等有着重要的理论价值,并对“全面推进中国式现代化新时代建设实践”具有重要意义。 During the transition to a post-industrial era,the intangible economy's emergence-characterized by intangible investments and cultural production-has precipitated historic transformations in socioeconomic formations.This is particularly evident in contemporary capitalist modes of production regarding their operational domains and organizational structures.When analyzed through Marx's critique of political economy in Das Kapital and contextualized within the current global political-economic order dominated by developed capitalist nations,this phenomenon fundamentally manifests capital logic's contemporary operations.The inherent dialectical contradictions of capital logic engender dual implications for realizing economic justice globally,particularly for populations in developing countries,China being a salient case.This necessitates that Chinese-style modernization be fundamentally characterized by the socialist application of the intangible economy.Such application essentially entails substituting capital logic with people-centric rationality,positioning intangible economy development as both strategic foundation and critical pathway toward achieving socialist economic justice with common prosperity as its cornerstone.This investigation holds significant theoretical value for advancing contemporary research on Marx's labor theory of value in the new era,while simultaneously bearing practical importance for comprehensively implementing Chinese-style modernization.
作者 赵海瑞 南晗 Zhao Hairui;Nan Han
出处 《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2025年第3期1-8,152,共9页 Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金后期资助一般项目“马克思现代性批判理论及其当代启示”(22FZXB001)阶段性成果 国家社会科学基金重大项目“马克思主义社会发展理论的当代重大问题研究”(19ZDA20)阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献80

  • 1杨一帆,潘君豪.老年数字鸿沟治理的一个分析框架[J].老龄科学研究,2019,0(10):58-67. 被引量:43
  • 2孙显蔚.马克思主义与全球化——《德意志意识形态》的当代阐释学术研讨会综述[J].理论视野,2002(1):21-23. 被引量:1
  • 3韩民春.从“数字鸿沟”看世界经济发展与贫富差距[J].太平洋学报,2001,9(1):54-61. 被引量:16
  • 4.《马克思恩格斯全集》[M].人民出版社,1960年版.卷二十-第91-92页.
  • 5OECD. Understanding the Digital Divide, http: //wwwl. oecd. org/dsti/sti/prod/Digital_ divide, pdf, 2001.
  • 6David, P. , D. Foray, Information Distribution and the Growth of Economically Valuable Knowledge: A Rationale for Technological Infrastructure Polities, 1996.In Teubal, M. , etc., (eds.), Technological Infrastructure Policy: An Interrnational Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  • 7Hargittai, Eszter, Weaving the Western Web: Explaining Differences in Intemet Connectivity Among OECD Countries. Telecommunications Policy, 23 (10-11), 1999.
  • 8EU&G8, Okinawa Charter on Global Information Society. http: //europa.eu, int/comm, lxtemal_ raltions/g7 _ g8/in-tro/global_info_society, htm, 2000.
  • 9Kirkman, Geoffery, and Jeffery Sachs, Subtract the Divide. World Link, Januarfy/February 2001.
  • 10Bodriguez, Francisco and Ernest, Wilson Ⅲ, Are Poor Countries Losing the Information Revolution? The World Bank Info-Dev, http: //www. infodev/library/ wilsonrodriguez, doe, 2000.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部